Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956282›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2015

Impact of interactive voice response technology on primary adherence to bisphosphonate therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

A D Cizmic, R M F Heilmann, J L Milchak, C S Riggs, S J Billups

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Improving drug adherence in osteoporosis: an update on more recent studies.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A D CizmicProvidence Medical Group, 4400 NE Halsey Street, Building 2, Suite 490, Portland, OR, 97213, USA, amber.cizmic@providence.org.
R M F Heilmann
J L Milchak
C S Riggs
S J Billups
Kaiser Permanente · USProvidence Regional Medical Center Everett · USRegis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledOsteoporosis (weak bones) is a disorder that has high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Effective treatment is available for this disorder, but many patients choose not to start therapy. This is the first study showing an intervention that increases the initiation rates to medications for osteoporosis.

introductionOne out of six patients prescribed an oral bisphosphonate does not initiate therapy, a phenomenon known as primary non-adherence. Reasons for bisphosphonate primary non-adherence have been identified, but not interventions that positively impact primary adherence rates. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of interactive voice response technology to improve oral bisphosphonate primary adherence.

methodsThis was a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted in January-December 2014 at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, an integrated healthcare system. Adults with a new oral bisphosphonate prescription for osteoporosis or osteopenia which was not purchased within 14-20 days of being ordered were included. There were 127 and 118 patients in the intervention group and control groups, respectively. The intervention group received an interactive voice response phone call followed by a letter 1 week later if primary non-adherence continued, whereas the control group did not receive any outreach. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who purchased their oral bisphosphonate within 25 days of randomization.

resultsThere were 62/127 (48.8%) intervention patients and 36/118 (30.5%) control patients who purchased their bisphosphonate prescription within 25 days of randomization (OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.29-3.67). When adjusted for age, sex, history of bone mineral density scan and fracture, the odds ratio for intervention versus control group was 2.3 (95% CI 1.34-3.94).

conclusionAn interactive voice response phone call and follow-up letter significantly improved primary adherence to oral bisphosphonate therapy. Such an intervention could be considered for improving primary adherence rates to other medication classes.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringTelephoneAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overBone Density Conservation AgentsColoradoCorrespondence as TopicDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesProspective StudiesBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID25956282
OpenAlexW756340226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.