Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2015
Effect of different rehydration temperatures on the survival of human vitrified-warmed oocytes.
Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved clinical outcomes with a modified warming protocol in donor oocyte cycles.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- An Eight Year Experience of Autologous Oocyte Vitrification for Infertile Patients Owing to Unavailability of Sperm on Oocyte Retrieval Day.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Freeze/thaw stress induces organelle remodeling and membrane recycling in cryopreserved human mature oocytes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016Article
- High survival of mouse oocytes using an optimized vitrification protocol.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of different exposure temperatures during the dilution process on the survival rate of vitrified oocytes and following development.
methodsPatients were divided at random into two groups for different dilution temperature (20-22 °C, RT group; 37 °C,37 °C group) according to computer-generated random numbers on the day of oocyte warming. The survival and fertilization rates of vitrified oocytes as well as the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates of the resulting embryos were recorded.
resultsA total of 662 and 676 oocytes were warmed in the 37 °C group and RT group, respectively, and significant difference was observed in the survival rate between 37 °C group (88.37%) and RT group (79.88%) (P = 0.0000). There was significant difference between the survival rate of 37 °C group (87.27%) and RT group (75.64%) in nondonor patients (P = 0.0001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that dilution temperature (β = 0.079, P = 0.017) and clinical outcomes of fresh cycles (β = 0.063, P = 0.001) were significantly and independently associated with survival rate. No significant difference was found between the 37 °C group and RT group in: fertilization rate (66.67 versus 65.37%), implantation rate (20.0 versus 19.46%), clinical pregnancy rate (37.5 versus 35.0%).
conclusionsIn conclusion, the results of this study give supportive evidence of the application of 37 °C in the dilution process, especially for oocytes of poor quality. Further studies with well-controlled experimental groups are needed to optimize protocols for human oocyte vitrification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.