ArticleBMC genomics2015
Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic models for accurate estimation of breeding values in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis Bong. Carr).Heredity · 2026Article
- Article
- NAMPHORA: a fossil and modern pollen database from Northern Africa and adjacent Mediterranean and Arabian regions.Scientific data · 2026Article
- MMGS: a novel genomic prediction framework to integrate genotype, environment and their interactions for multi-environment breeding trials.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Multivariate models improve accuracy of genomic prediction for spring frost tolerance in Norway spruce.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genetic Differentiation of Chinese Fir Populations From Mainland China and Taiwan as Revealed by Genotyping-By-Sequencing Analysis, With Implication for Taxonomic Position of the Species.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Genome-wide association study for yield and quality of granulated cassava processed product.The plant genome · 2024Article
- High-density genetic linkage mapping in Sitka spruce advances the integration of genomic resources in conifers.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Comparison of ddRADseq and EUChip60K SNP genotyping systems for population genetics and genomic selection inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Novel SNP markers for flowering and seed quality traits in faba bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Improving lodgepole pine genomic evaluation using spatial correlation structure and SNP selection with single-step GBLUP.Heredity · 2022Article
- Metadata analysis indicates biased estimation of genetic parameters and gains using conventional pedigree information instead of genomic-based approaches in tree breeding.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Integrating genomic information and productivity and climate-adaptability traits into a regional white spruce breeding program.PloS one · 2022Article
- Achievements and Challenges of Genomics-Assisted Breeding in Forest Trees: From Marker-Assisted Selection to Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Assessing the correlations and selection criteria between different traits in wheat salt-tolerant genotypes.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Genetic Variation in Drought-Tolerance Traits and Their Relationships to Growth inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic selection (GS) in forestry can substantially reduce the length of breeding cycle and increase gain per unit time through early selection and greater selection intensity, particularly for traits of low heritability and late expression. Affordable next-generation sequencing technologies made it possible to genotype large numbers of trees at a reasonable cost.
resultsGenotyping-by-sequencing was used to genotype 1,126 Interior spruce trees representing 25 open-pollinated families planted over three sites in British Columbia, Canada. Four imputation algorithms were compared (mean value (MI), singular value decomposition (SVD), expectation maximization (EM), and a newly derived, family-based k-nearest neighbor (kNN-Fam)). Trees were phenotyped for several yield and wood attributes. Single- and multi-site GS prediction models were developed using the Ridge Regression Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (RR-BLUP) and the Generalized Ridge Regression (GRR) to test different assumption about trait architecture. Finally, using PCA, multi-trait GS prediction models were developed. The EM and kNN-Fam imputation methods were superior for 30 and 60% missing data, respectively. The RR-BLUP GS prediction model produced better accuracies than the GRR indicating that the genetic architecture for these traits is complex. GS prediction accuracies for multi-site were high and better than those of single-sites while multi-site predictability produced the lowest accuracies reflecting type-b genetic correlations and deemed unreliable. The incorporation of genomic information in quantitative genetics analyses produced more realistic heritability estimates as half-sib pedigree tended to inflate the additive genetic variance and subsequently both heritability and gain estimates. Principle component scores as representatives of multi-trait GS prediction models produced surprising results where negatively correlated traits could be concurrently selected for using PCA2 and PCA3.
conclusionsThe application of GS to open-pollinated family testing, the simplest form of tree improvement evaluation methods, was proven to be effective. Prediction accuracies obtained for all traits greatly support the integration of GS in tree breeding. While the within-site GS prediction accuracies were high, the results clearly indicate that single-site GS models ability to predict other sites are unreliable supporting the utilization of multi-site approach. Principle component scores provided an opportunity for the concurrent selection of traits with different phenotypic optima.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.