Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25955639›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2015

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Survival at Posterior Contact Lens Surfaces after Daily Wear.

Yvonne T Wu, Lucia S Zhu, K P Connie Tam, David J Evans, Suzanne M J Fleiszig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eye infection risks fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yvonne T Wu*BOptom, PhD, FAAO †BA ‡PhD §OD, PhD, FAAO School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California (all authors); College of Pharmacy, Touro University California, Vallejo, California (DJE); and Graduate Groups in Vision Science, Microbiology, and Infectious Diseases and Immunity, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California (SMJF).
Lucia S Zhu
K P Connie Tam
David J Evans
Suzanne M J Fleiszig
Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado · BRUniversity of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

SIGNIFICANCE OF CORNEAL CELL INVASION BY BACTERIAR01EY011221 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Suzanne MJ FLEISZIG · 1995 to 2026
$8.4M
Cytoskeletal Keratins in Epithelial Immunity to Bacterial KeratitisR01EY023000 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAM, K. P. CONNIE · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS EY011221NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011221NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis is a sight-threatening complication of contact lens wear, yet mechanisms by which lenses predispose to infection remain unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that tear fluid at the posterior contact lens surface can lose antimicrobial activity over time during lens wear.

methodsDaily disposable lenses were worn for 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 hours immediately after removal from their packaging or after presoaking in sterile saline for 2 days to remove packaging solution. Unworn lenses were also tested, some coated in tears "aged" in vitro for 1 or 8 hours. Lenses were placed anterior surface down into tryptic soy agar cradles containing gentamicin (100 μg/mL) to kill bacteria already on the lens and posterior surfaces inoculated with gentamicin-resistant P. aeruginosa for 3 hours. Surviving bacteria were enumerated by viable counts of lens homogenates.

resultsPosterior surfaces of lenses worn by patients for 8 hours supported more P. aeruginosa growth than lenses worn for only 1 hour, if lenses were presoaked before wear (∼ 2.4-fold, p = 0.01). This increase was offset if lenses were not presoaked to remove packaging solution (p = 0.04 at 2 and 4 hours). Irrespective of presoaking, lenses worn for 8 hours showed more growth on their posterior surface than unworn lenses coated with tear fluid that was aged for 8 hours in vitro (∼ 8.6-fold, presoaked, p = 0.003; ∼ 5.4-fold from packaging solution, p = 0.004). Indeed, in vitro incubation did not impact tear antimicrobial activity.

conclusionsThis study shows that postlens tear fluid can lose antimicrobial activity over time during contact lens wear, supporting the idea that efficient tear exchange under a lens is critical for homeostasis. Additional studies are needed to determine applicability to other lens types, wearing modalities, and relevance to contact lens-related infections.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial AdhesionColony Count, MicrobialContact Lenses, HydrophilicDisposable EquipmentDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleGentamicinsHumansMalePseudomonas aeruginosaTearsTime FactorsYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicins

Identifiers

PMID25955639
PMCPMC4575223
OpenAlexW2396346916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.