Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25955417›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The in-vivo use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to detect inflammation elicits a cytokine response but does not aggravate experimental arthritis.

Eline A Vermeij, Marije I Koenders, Miranda B Bennink, Lindsey A Crowe, Lionel Maurizi, Jean-Paul Vallée, Heinrich Hofmann, Wim B van den Berg, Peter L E M van Lent, Fons A J van de Loo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of clinically relevant iron oxide nanoparticles on macrophage polarization, tumor growth and tumor microenvironment modulation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Unlocking Transplant Tolerance with Biomaterials.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward RNA nanoparticle vaccines: synergizing RNA and inorganic nanoparticles to achieve immunopotentiation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nanotechnology and Pediatric Cancer: Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment.Iranian journal of pediatric hematology and oncology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eline A VermeijExperimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marije I KoendersExperimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Miranda B BenninkExperimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lindsey A CroweDivision of Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lionel MauriziLaboratory of Powder Technology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Paul ValléeDivision of Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Heinrich HofmannLaboratory of Powder Technology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Wim B van den BergExperimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter L E M van LentExperimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Fons A J van de LooExperimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuperparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPION) are used in diagnostic imaging of a variety of different diseases. For such in-vivo application, an additional coating with a polymer, for example polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), is needed to stabilize the SPION and prevent aggregation. As the particles are foreign to the body, reaction against the SPION could occur. In this study we investigated the effects that SPION may have on experimental arthritis after intra-articular (i.a.) or intravenous (i.v.) injection.

methodsPVA-coated SPION were injected either i.a. (6 or 24 μg iron) or i.v. (100 μg or 1 mg iron) into naïve Toll-like receptor-4 deficient (TLR4-/-) or wild-type C57Bl/6 mice, or C57Bl/6 mice with antigen-induced arthritis. As control, some mice were injected with PVA or PBS. MR imaging was performed at 1 and 7 days after injection. Mice were sacrificed 2 hours and 1, 2, 7, 10 and 14 days after injection of the SPION, and RNA from synovium and liver was isolated for pro-inflammatory gene expression analysis. Serum cytokine measurements and whole knee joint histology were also performed.

resultsInjection of a high dose of SPION or PVA into naïve knee joints resulted in an immediate upregulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression in the synovium. A similar gene expression profile was observed after SPION or PVA injection into knee joints of TLR4-/- mice, indicating that this effect is not due to LPS contamination. Histological analysis of the knee joints also revealed synovial inflammation after SPION injection. Two hours after i.v. injection of SPION or PVA into naïve mice, an upregulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression was detected in the liver. Administration of SPION or PVA into arthritic mice via i.a. injection did not result in an upregulation in gene expression and also no additional effects were observed on histology. MR imaging and histology showed long-term retention of SPION in the inflamed joint. However, 14 days after the injections no long-term effects were evident for gene expression, histology or serum cytokine concentrations.

conclusionsInjection of SPION, either locally or systemically, gives an acute inflammatory response. In the long term, up to 14 days after the injection, while the SPION reside in the joint, no further activating effects of SPION were observed. Hence, we conclude that SPION do not aggravate arthritis and can therefore be used safely to detect joint inflammation by MR imaging.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthritis, ExperimentalCytokinesFerric CompoundsInjections, Intra-ArticularInjections, IntravenousMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesMicePolyvinyl AlcoholCytokinesFerric Compoundsferric oxideMagnetite NanoparticlesPolyvinyl Alcohol

Identifiers

PMID25955417
PMCPMC4425489
OpenAlexW1782867240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.