Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25955391›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species.

Roberta Pennati, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Riccardo Brunetti, Federico Caicci, Fabio Gasparini, Francesca Griggio, Atsuko Sato, Thomas Stach, Sabrina Kaul-Strehlow, Carmela Gissi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fine-Tuned Expression of Evolutionarily Conserved Signaling Molecules in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transitions of motor neuron activities duringFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brachyury controlsDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  15. Quantitative Dissection of the ProximalFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberta PennatiDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Gentile Francesco FicetolaDipartimento di Scienze dell'Ambiente e del Territorio e di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy; Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA), Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Riccardo BrunettiMuseo di Storia Naturale, Venezia, Italy.
Federico CaicciDipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Fabio GaspariniDipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Francesca GriggioDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Atsuko SatoDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas StachHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut fur Lebenswissenschaften, Vergleichende Zoologie, Berlin, Germany.
Sabrina Kaul-StrehlowDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Carmela GissiDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Lucia ManniDipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestinalis species, namely C. intestinalis type A and type B. So far, no substantial morphological differences have been identified between individuals belonging to the two types. Here we present morphometric, immunohistochemical, and histological analyses, as well as 3-D reconstructions, of late larvae obtained by cross-fertilization experiments of molecularly determined type A and type B adults, sampled in different seasons and in four different localities. Our data point to quantitative and qualitative differences in the trunk shape of larvae belonging to the two types. In particular, type B larvae exhibit a longer pre-oral lobe, longer and relatively narrower total body length, and a shorter ocellus-tail distance than type A larvae. All these differences were found to be statistically significant in a Discriminant Analysis. Depending on the number of analyzed parameters, the obtained discriminant function was able to correctly classify > 93% of the larvae, with the remaining misclassified larvae attributable to the existence of intra-type seasonal variability. No larval differences were observed at the level of histology and immunohistochemical localization of peripheral sensory neurons. We conclude that type A and type B are two distinct species that can be distinguished on the basis of larval morphology and molecular data. Since the identified larval differences appear to be valid diagnostic characters, we suggest to raise both types to the rank of species and to assign them distinct names.

Indexed as

AnimalsCiona intestinalisLarvaModels, AnatomicSensory Receptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID25955391
PMCPMC4425531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.