Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954967›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Effects of short term bioturbation by common voles on biogeochemical soil variables.

Burkhard Wilske, Jana A Eccard, Marcus Zistl-Schlingmann, Maximilian Hohmann, Annabel Methler, Antje Herde, Thilo Liesenjohann, Michael Dannenmann, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Lutz Breuer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Burkhard WilskeDepartment of Landscape, Water and Biogeochemical Cycles, Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Research Centre for Bio Systems, Land Use and Nutrition (IFZ), Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Jana A EccardInstitute for Animal Ecology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Marcus Zistl-SchlingmannKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT/IMK-IFU, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Maximilian HohmannDepartment of Landscape, Water and Biogeochemical Cycles, Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Research Centre for Bio Systems, Land Use and Nutrition (IFZ), Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Annabel MethlerDepartment of Landscape, Water and Biogeochemical Cycles, Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Research Centre for Bio Systems, Land Use and Nutrition (IFZ), Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Antje HerdeInstitute for Animal Ecology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Thilo LiesenjohannInstitute for Animal Ecology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Michael DannenmannKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT/IMK-IFU, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Klaus Butterbach-BahlKarlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT/IMK-IFU, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany; International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lutz BreuerDepartment of Landscape, Water and Biogeochemical Cycles, Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management (ILR), Research Centre for Bio Systems, Land Use and Nutrition (IFZ), Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioturbation contributes to soil formation and ecosystem functioning. With respect to the active transport of matter by voles, bioturbation may be considered as a very dynamic process among those shaping soil formation and biogeochemistry. The present study aimed at characterizing and quantifying the effects of bioturbation by voles on soil water relations and carbon and nitrogen stocks. Bioturbation effects were examined based on a field set up in a luvic arenosol comprising of eight 50 × 50 m enclosures with greatly different numbers of common vole (Microtus arvalis L., ca. 35-150 individuals ha-1 mth-1). Eleven key soil variables were analyzed: bulk density, infiltration rate, saturated hydraulic conductivity, water holding capacity, contents of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (N), CO2 emission potential, C/N ratio, the stable isotopic signatures of 13C and 15N, and pH. The highest vole densities were hypothesized to cause significant changes in some variables within 21 months. Results showed that land history had still a major influence, as eight key variables displayed an additional or sole influence of topography. However, the δ15N at depths of 10-20 and 20-30 cm decreased and increased with increasing vole numbers, respectively. Also the CO2 emission potential from soil collected at a depth of 15-30 cm decreased and the C/N ratio at 5-10 cm depth narrowed with increasing vole numbers. These variables indicated the first influence of voles on the respective mineralization processes in some soil layers. Tendencies of vole activity homogenizing SOC and N contents across layers were not significant. The results of the other seven key variables did not confirm significant effects of voles. Thus overall, we found mainly a first response of variables that are indicative for changes in biogeochemical dynamics but not yet of those representing changes in pools.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmentAnimalsArvicolinaeCarbonCarbon DioxideClimateNitrogenPoaceaeSoilWaterCarbonCarbon DioxideNitrogenSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID25954967
PMCPMC4425692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.