Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954629›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Analysis of Out Door Patients' Prescriptions According to World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators Among Private Hospitals in Western India.

Prakash R Shelat, Shivaprasad Kalakappa Kumbar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prakash R ShelatAssistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, P.D.U. Govt. Medical College , Rajkot, Gujarat, India .
Shivaprasad Kalakappa KumbarAssistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, BLDEU's Shri B. M. Patil Medical College , Bijapur, Karnataka, India .
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription is document through which doctor, patient and pharmacist are communicated. Many a times if these documents are not properly written or misinterpreted it can affect management of patients. WHO established prescribing indicators to analyse prescription and promoted rational use of drugs and better management of patients.

aimTo study the prescription pattern according to WHO prescribing indicators among private hospitals. SETTINGS AND

designThe observational, prospective study carried out at different private hospitals at metro city in Western India to study the prescription pattern among private hospital. MATERIALS AND

methodsStudy was conducted at different private hospitals of metro city. A total of 250 prescriptions of outdoor patients from various departments of private hospitals were collected for a period of three months (August to October) 2012 and evaluated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The study was analysed using Z-test.

resultsPatient details like age and gender was not written in all (100%) prescriptions. It was noticed that dose, direction of drug and duration of treatment was not completely written in 90%, 74% and 80% of prescriptions respectively. Abbreviations were used in all (100%) prescriptions. Doctor's medical registration number was mentioned in 0% prescriptions. Total 869 drugs were prescribed in 250 prescriptions. Average number of drug prescribed was 3.38±1.79 (Mean±SD). It was reported that Group II (3 to 4 encoutner) was significantly higher as compared to Group I (less than or equal to 2 encoutner) and Group III( more than four encounter). It was significantly (p<0.05) prescribed brand name prescriptions (93.33%) as compared to generic name prescriptions (6.7%). Percentage of encounter with antibiotics and injections was 54% and 18% respectively. Approximately 70% drugs were prescribed according to Essential Medicine List (EML) of State. Antibiotics accounted 30% of prescribed drugs which was significantly higher as compared to other group of prescribed drugs.

conclusionOur study revealed that prescription errors were most commonly observed at private hospitals and antibiotics was commonly prescribed in private sector. Therefore, strict policy to good prescribing practice and strict antibiotic policy in outdoor patients are required to promote rational use of drugs.

Indexed as

AntibioticsEssential medicinesPrivate practitioners

Identifiers

PMID25954629
PMCPMC4413077
OpenAlexW2416450126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.