Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954504›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2015

Study and use of the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in pigs: a review.

Chengli Hou, Xiangfang Zeng, Fengjuan Yang, Hong Liu, Shiyan Qiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct functional roles ofAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Low-Energy Diets Supplemented withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sheep-derived butyrate-producingAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengli HouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China.
Xiangfang ZengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China.
Fengjuan YangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China.
Hong LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China.
Shiyan QiaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China.
China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are living microorganisms that provide a wide variety of health benefits to the host when ingested in adequate amounts. The bacterial strains most frequently used as probiotic agents are lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus reuteri, which is one of the few endogenous Lactobacillus species found in the gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates, including humans, rats, pigs and chickens. L. reuteri is one of the most well documented probiotic species and has been widely utilized as a probiotic in humans and animals for many years. Initially, L. reuteri was used in humans to reduce the incidence and the severity of diarrhea, prevent colic and necrotic enterocolitis, and maintain a functional mucosal barrier. As interest in alternatives to in-feed antibiotics has grown in recent years, some evidence has emerged that probiotics may promote growth, improve the efficiency of feed utilization, prevent diarrhea, and regulate the immune system in pigs. In this review, the characteristics of L. reuteri are described, in order to update the evidence on the efficacy of using L. reuteri in pigs.

Indexed as

AntibioticsApplicationLactobacillus reuteriPigsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID25954504
PMCPMC4423586
OpenAlexW1965000054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.