Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954403›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2014

Examining the Multi-level Fit between Work and Technology in a Secure Messaging Implementation.

Mustafa Ozkaynak, Sharon Johnson, Stephanie Shimada, Beth Ann Petrakis, Bengisu Tulu, Cliona Archambeault, Gemmae Fix, Erin Schwartz, Susan Woods

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mustafa OzkaynakUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Sharon JohnsonWorcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.
Stephanie ShimadaCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford, MA.
Beth Ann PetrakisCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford, MA.
Bengisu TuluWorcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.
Cliona ArchambeaultNew England Veterans Engineering Resource Center, Boston, MA.
Gemmae FixCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford, MA.
Erin SchwartzPortland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR.
Susan WoodsPortland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR.
Portland VA Medical Center · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secure messaging (SM) allows patients to communicate with their providers for non-urgent health issues. Like other health information technologies, the design and implementation of SM should account for workflow to avoid suboptimal outcomes. SM may present unique workflow challenges because patients add a layer of complexity, as they are also direct users of the system. This study explores SM implementation at two Veterans Health Administration facilities. We interviewed twenty-nine members of eight primary care teams using semi-structured interviews. Questions addressed staff opinions about the integration of SM with daily practice, and team members' attitudes and experiences with SM. We describe the clinical workflow for SM, examining complexity and variability. We identified eight workflow issues directly related to efficiency and patient satisfaction, based on an exploration of the technology fit with multilevel factors. These findings inform organizational interventions that will accommodate SM implementation and lead to more patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityElectronic Health RecordsElectronic MailWorkflowHumansInterviews as TopicPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID25954403
PMCPMC4419966
OpenAlexW2406895425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.