Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954385›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2014

Automatic extraction of drug indications from FDA drug labels.

Ritu Khare, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Zhiyong Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge-guided generative artificial intelligence for automated taxonomy learning from drug labels.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracting Semantics from Census-based Reference Data.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing · 2021
    Article
  5. Exploring Novel Computable Knowledge in Structured Drug Product Labels.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ritu KhareNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Chih-Hsuan WeiNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894.
National Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting computable indications, i.e. drug-disease treatment relationships, from narrative drug resources is the key for building a gold standard drug indication repository. The two steps to the extraction problem are disease named-entity recognition (NER) to identify disease mentions from a free-text description and disease classification to distinguish indications from other disease mentions in the description. While there exist many tools for disease NER, disease classification is mostly achieved through human annotations. For example, we recently resorted to human annotations to prepare a corpus, LabeledIn, capturing structured indications from the drug labels submitted to FDA by pharmaceutical companies. In this study, we present an automatic end-to-end framework to extract structured and normalized indications from FDA drug labels. In addition to automatic disease NER, a key component of our framework is a machine learning method that is trained on the LabeledIn corpus to classify the NER-computed disease mentions as "indication vs. non-indication." Through experiments with 500 drug labels, our end-to-end system delivered 86.3% F1-measure in drug indication extraction, with 17% improvement over baseline. Further analysis shows that the indication classifier delivers a performance comparable to human experts and that the remaining errors are mostly due to disease NER (more than 50%). Given its performance, we conclude that our end-to-end approach has the potential to significantly reduce human annotation costs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug LabelingDiseaseHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID25954385
PMCPMC4419914
OpenAlexW2409319733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.