Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954366›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2014

Using Anchors to Estimate Clinical State without Labeled Data.

Yoni Halpern, Youngduck Choi, Steven Horng, David Sontag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Generative transfer learning for measuring plausibility of EHR diagnosis records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. sureLDA: A multidisease automated phenotyping method for the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. High-fidelity phenotyping: richness and freedom from bias.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoni HalpernNew York University, New York, NY.
Youngduck ChoiNew York University, New York, NY.
Steven HorngBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
David SontagNew York University, New York, NY.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000038 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL · 2012 to 2014
$16.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000038NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL120122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a novel framework for learning to estimate and predict clinical state variables without labeled data. The resulting models can used for electronic phenotyping, triggering clinical decision support, and cohort selection. The framework relies on key observations which we characterize and term "anchor variables". By specifying anchor variables, an expert encodes a certain amount of domain knowledge about the problem while the rest of learning proceeds in an unsupervised manner. The ability to build anchors upon standardized ontologies and the framework's ability to learn from unlabeled data promote generalizability across institutions. We additionally develop a user interface to enable experts to choose anchor variables in an informed manner. The framework is applied to electronic medical record-based phenotyping to enable real-time decision support in the emergency department. We validate the learned models using a prospectively gathered set of gold-standard responses from emergency physicians for nine clinically relevant variables.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsUser-Computer InterfaceDecision Support TechniquesHumansModels, TheoreticalVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID25954366
PMCPMC4419996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.