Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954363›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2014

An evaluation of a natural language processing tool for identifying and encoding allergy information in emergency department clinical notes.

Foster R Goss, Joseph M Plasek, Jason J Lau, Diane L Seger, Frank Y Chang, Li Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Using natural language processing in emergency medicine health service research: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A dynamic reaction picklist for improving allergy reaction documentation in the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. AllergyMap: An Open Source Corpus of Allergy Mention Normalizations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Foster R GossTufts Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine and Clinical Decision Making, Boston, MA.
Joseph M PlasekDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jason J LauDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Diane L SegerClinical & Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA.
Frank Y ChangClinical Informatics, Partners eCare, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA.
Li ZhouDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Clinical Informatics, Partners eCare, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

Encoding and Processing Patient Allergy Information in EHRsR01HS022728 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, LI · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS 1R01HS022728-01AHRQ HHS R01 HS022728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) visits due to allergic reactions are common. Allergy information is often recorded in free-text provider notes; however, this domain has not yet been widely studied by the natural language processing (NLP) community. We developed an allergy module built on the MTERMS NLP system to identify and encode food, drug, and environmental allergies and allergic reactions. The module included updates to our lexicon using standard terminologies, and novel disambiguation algorithms. We developed an annotation schema and annotated 400 ED notes that served as a gold standard for comparison to MTERMS output. MTERMS achieved an F-measure of 87.6% for the detection of allergen names and no known allergies, 90% for identifying true reactions in each allergy statement where true allergens were also identified, and 69% for linking reactions to their allergen. These preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility using NLP to extract and encode allergy information from clinical notes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalHypersensitivityNatural Language ProcessingHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25954363
PMCPMC4419999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.