Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954356›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2014

Characterizing the sublanguage of online breast cancer forums for medications, symptoms, and emotions.

Noémie Elhadad, Shaodian Zhang, Patricia Driscoll, Samuel Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "We make choices we think are going to save us": Debate and stance identification for online breast cancer CAM discussions.Proceedings of the ... International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Leveraging cues from person-generated health data for peer matching in online communities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Does sustained participation in an online health community affect sentiment?AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noémie ElhadadColumbia University, New York, NY.
Shaodian ZhangColumbia University, New York, NY.
Patricia DriscollColumbia University, New York, NY.
Samuel BrodyGoogle, Inc., New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online health communities play an increasingly prevalent role for patients and are the source of a growing body of research. A lexicon that represents the sublanguage of an online community is an important resource to enable analysis and tool development over this data source. This paper investigates a method to generate a lexicon representative of the language of members in a given community with respect to specific semantic types. We experiment with a breast cancer community and detect terms that belong to three semantic types: medications, symptoms and side effects, and emotions. We assess the ability of our automatically generated lexicons to detect new terms, and show that a data-driven approach captures the sublanguage of members in these communities, all the while increasing coverage of general-purpose terminologies. The code and the generated lexicons are made available to the research community.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsInternetSelf-Help GroupsVocabularyFemaleHumansSemantics

Identifiers

PMID25954356
PMCPMC4419934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.