Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954345›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2014

Clinical Workflow Observations to Identify Opportunities for Nurse, Physicians and Patients to Share a Patient-centered Plan of Care.

Sarah A Collins, Priscilla Gazarian, Diana Stade, Kelly McNally, Conny Morrison, Kumiko Ohashi, Lisa Lehmann, Anuj Dalal, David W Bates, Patricia C Dykes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03911687 (Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03911687 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) System

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60,893ConditionsHospital Acquired ConditionArmsCONCERN CDS system notification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Diagnostic Errors in the Acute Care Setting.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementation of acute care patient portals: recommendations on utility and use from six early adopters.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  6. Providers' Perspectives on Sharing Health Information through Acute Care Patient Portals.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  7. Acute care patient portals: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives on current practices.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  8. Sharing Clinical Notes with Hospitalized Patients via an Acute Care Portal.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah A CollinsPartners Healthcare Systems, Wellesley, MA ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Priscilla GazarianBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Diana StadeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Kelly McNallyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Conny MorrisonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Kumiko OhashiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lisa LehmannBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Anuj DalalBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
David W BatesPartners Healthcare Systems, Wellesley, MA ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Patricia C DykesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient- and Family-Centered Care (PFCC) is essential for high quality care in the critical and acute-specialty care hospital setting. Effective PFCC requires clinicians to form an integrated interprofessional team to collaboratively engage with the patient/family and contribute to a shared patient-centered plan of care. We conducted observations on a critical care and specialty unit to understand the plan of care activities and workflow documentation requirements for nurses and physicians to inform the development of a shared patient-centered plan of care to support patient engagement. We identified siloed plan of care documentation, with workflow opportunities to converge the nurses plan of care with the physician planned To-do lists and quality and safety checklists. Integration of nurses and physicians plan of care activities into a shared plan of care is a feasible and valuable step toward interprofessional teams that effectively engage patients in plan of care activities.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationWorkflowAcademic Medical CentersFamilyHumansInpatientsMassachusettsNursesPatient Care PlanningPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePhysiciansProfessional-Family Relations

Identifiers

PMID25954345
PMCPMC4419989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.