Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954321›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2015

Calling genotypes from public RNA-sequencing data enables identification of genetic variants that affect gene-expression levels.

Patrick Deelen, Daria V Zhernakova, Mark de Haan, Marijke van der Sijde, Marc Jan Bonder, Juha Karjalainen, K Joeri van der Velde, Kristin M Abbott, Jingyuan Fu, Cisca Wijmenga and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genotype prediction of 336,463 samples from public expression data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick DeelenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands ; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Genomics Coordination Center, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daria V ZhernakovaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mark de HaanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands ; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Genomics Coordination Center, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marijke van der SijdeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marc Jan BonderUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Juha KarjalainenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
K Joeri van der VeldeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands ; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Genomics Coordination Center, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kristin M AbbottUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jingyuan FuUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cisca WijmengaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Richard J SinkeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Morris A SwertzUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands ; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Genomics Coordination Center, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lude FrankeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is a powerful technique for the identification of genetic variants that affect gene-expression levels, either through expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping or through allele-specific expression (ASE) analysis. Given increasing numbers of RNA-seq samples in the public domain, we here studied to what extent eQTLs and ASE effects can be identified when using public RNA-seq data while deriving the genotypes from the RNA-sequencing reads themselves.

methodsWe downloaded the raw reads for all available human RNA-seq datasets. Using these reads we performed gene expression quantification. All samples were jointly normalized and subjected to a strict quality control. We also derived genotypes using the RNA-seq reads and used imputation to infer non-coding variants. This allowed us to perform eQTL mapping and ASE analyses jointly on all samples that passed quality control. Our results were validated using samples for which DNA-seq genotypes were available.

results4,978 public human RNA-seq runs, representing many different tissues and cell-types, passed quality control. Even though these data originated from many different laboratories, samples reflecting the same cell type clustered together, suggesting that technical biases due to different sequencing protocols are limited. In a joint analysis on the 1,262 samples with high quality genotypes, we identified cis-eQTLs effects for 8,034 unique genes (at a false discovery rate ≤0.05). eQTL mapping on individual tissues revealed that a limited number of samples already suffice to identify tissue-specific eQTLs for known disease-associated genetic variants. Additionally, we observed strong ASE effects for 34 rare pathogenic variants, corroborating previously observed effects on the corresponding protein levels.

conclusionsBy deriving and imputing genotypes from RNA-seq data, it is possible to identify both eQTLs and ASE effects. Given the exponential growth of the number of publicly available RNA-seq samples, we expect this approach will become especially relevant for studying the effects of tissue-specific and rare pathogenic genetic variants to aid clinical interpretation of exome and genome sequencing.

Identifiers

PMID25954321
PMCPMC4423486
OpenAlexW2040258642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.