ReviewFrontiers in genetics2015
Modeling the epigenetic attractors landscape: toward a post-genomic mechanistic understanding of development.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-dependent bistability leads to critical slowing down during floral transition in Arabidopsis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Rethinking crossover and recovery in eating disorders through a dynamic and value-sensitive framework.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026Article
- Review
- Kernel-DMD for multiome data integration and control.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Evolution from Composome to RNA Replicase.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A new immunological paradigm for diseases: the protein-homeostasis-system hypothesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Attractors are less stable than their basins: Canalization creates a coherence gap in gene regulatory networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Direct in vivo reprogramming to relieve tissue ischemia via induced vasculogenesis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Harnessing the analog computing power of regulatory networks with the Regulatory Network Machine.iScience · 2025Article
- A system-level model reveals that transcriptional stochasticity is required for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Article
- Engineering principles for rationally design therapeutic strategies against hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- Building a Co-ordinated Musculoskeletal System: The Plasticity of the Developing Skeleton in Response to Muscle Contractions.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2023Article
- Dynamical landscapes of cell fate decisions.Interface focus · 2022Review
- Cell Architecture-Dependent Constraints: Critical Safeguards to Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A system-level mechanistic explanation for asymmetric stem cell fates: Arabidopsis thaliana root niche as a study system.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Review
- Making Sense of the Epigenome Using Data Integration Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Allele-specific epigenome maps reveal sequence-dependent stochastic switching at regulatory loci.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Structural robustness of mammalian transcription factor networks reveals plasticity across development.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robust temporal and spatial patterns of cell types emerge in the course of normal development in multicellular organisms. The onset of degenerative diseases may result from altered cell fate decisions that give rise to pathological phenotypes. Complex networks of genetic and non-genetic components underlie such normal and altered morphogenetic patterns. Here we focus on the networks of regulatory interactions involved in cell-fate decisions. Such networks modeled as dynamical non-linear systems attain particular stable configurations on gene activity that have been interpreted as cell-fate states. The network structure also restricts the most probable transition patterns among such states. The so-called Epigenetic Landscape (EL), originally proposed by C. H. Waddington, was an early attempt to conceptually explain the emergence of developmental choices as the result of intrinsic constraints (regulatory interactions) shaped during evolution. Thanks to the wealth of molecular genetic and genomic studies, we are now able to postulate gene regulatory networks (GRN) grounded on experimental data, and to derive EL models for specific cases. This, in turn, has motivated several mathematical and computational modeling approaches inspired by the EL concept, that may be useful tools to understand and predict cell-fate decisions and emerging patterns. In order to distinguish between the classical metaphorical EL proposal of Waddington, we refer to the Epigenetic Attractors Landscape (EAL), a proposal that is formally framed in the context of GRNs and dynamical systems theory. In this review we discuss recent EAL modeling strategies, their conceptual basis and their application in studying the emergence of both normal and pathological developmental processes. In addition, we discuss how model predictions can shed light into rational strategies for cell fate regulation, and we point to challenges ahead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.