Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954286›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Distributions, ex situ conservation priorities, and genetic resource potential of crop wild relatives of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., I. series Batatas].

Colin K Khoury, Bettina Heider, Nora P Castañeda-Álvarez, Harold A Achicanoy, Chrystian C Sosa, Richard E Miller, Robert W Scotland, John R I Wood, Genoveva Rossel, Lauren A Eserman and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ecogeographic Study ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sweet Potato (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Colin K KhouryInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia ; Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, Wageningen Netherlands.
Bettina HeiderInternational Potato Center, CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas, Lima Peru.
Nora P Castañeda-ÁlvarezInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia ; School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham UK.
Harold A AchicanoyInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia.
Chrystian C SosaInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia.
Richard E MillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA USA.
Robert W ScotlandDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford UK.
John R I WoodDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford UK.
Genoveva RosselInternational Potato Center, CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas, Lima Peru.
Lauren A EsermanDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.
Robert L JarretPlant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Griffin, GA USA.
G C YenchoDepartment of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC USA.
Vivian BernauInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia ; Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Henry JuarezInternational Potato Center, CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas, Lima Peru.
Steven SoteloInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia.
Stef de HaanInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture, Cali Colombia ; International Potato Center, CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas, Lima Peru.
Paul C StruikCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, Wageningen Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop wild relatives of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., I. series Batatas] have the potential to contribute to breeding objectives for this important root crop. Uncertainty in regard to species boundaries and their phylogenetic relationships, the limited availability of germplasm with which to perform crosses, and the difficulty of introgression of genes from wild species has constrained their utilization. Here, we compile geographic occurrence data on relevant sweetpotato wild relatives and produce potential distribution models for the species. We then assess the comprehensiveness of ex situ germplasm collections, contextualize these results with research and breeding priorities, and use ecogeographic information to identify species with the potential to contribute desirable agronomic traits. The fourteen species that are considered the closest wild relatives of sweetpotato generally occur from the central United States to Argentina, with richness concentrated in Mesoamerica and in the extreme Southeastern United States. Currently designated species differ among themselves and in comparison to the crop in their adaptations to temperature, precipitation, and edaphic characteristics and most species also show considerable intraspecific variation. With 79% of species identified as high priority for further collecting, we find that these crop genetic resources are highly under-represented in ex situ conservation systems and thus their availability to breeders and researchers is inadequate. We prioritize taxa and specific geographic locations for further collecting in order to improve the completeness of germplasm collections. In concert with enhanced conservation of sweetpotato wild relatives, further taxonomic research, characterization and evaluation of germplasm, and improving the techniques to overcome barriers to introgression with wild species are needed in order to mobilize these genetic resources for crop breeding.

Indexed as

crop diversitycrop improvementcrop wild relativesfood securitygap analysisplant genetic resources

Identifiers

PMID25954286
PMCPMC4404978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.