Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25954161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2015

Individual variability in the anatomical distribution of nodes participating in rich club structural networks.

Madison Kocher, Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Travis Nesland, Chris Rorden, Julius Fridriksson, Maria V Spampinato, Leonardo Bonilha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rich-club in the brain's macrostructure: Insights from graph theoretical analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madison KocherDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
Ezequiel GleichgerrchtDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
Travis NeslandDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
Chris RordenDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communications Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA.
Maria V SpampinatoDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

Cortical and Subcortical Organization of Language-Related Semantic Processing in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01DC014021 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2014 to 2023
$4.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC014021NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent advances in computational analyses of structural neuroimaging, it is possible to comprehensively map neural connectivity, i.e., the brain connectome. The architectural organization of the connectome is believed to play an important role in several biological processes. Central to the conformation of the connectome are connectivity hubs, which are likely to be organized in accordance with the rich club phenomenon, as evidenced by graph theory analyses of neural architecture. It is yet unclear whether rich club connectivity hubs are consistently organized in the same anatomical framework across healthy adults. We constructed the brain connectome from 43 healthy adults, based on T1-weighted and diffusion tensor MRI data. Probabilistic fiber tractography was used to evaluate connectivity between each possible pair of cortical anatomical regions of interest. Connectivity hubs were identified in accordance with the rich club phenomenon applied to binarized matrices, and the variability in frequency of hub participation was assessed node-wise across all subjects. The anatomical location of nodes participating in rich club networks was fairly consistent across subjects. The most common locations for rich club nodes were identified in integrative areas, such as the cingulate and pericingulate regions, medial aspect of the occipital areas and precuneus; or else, they were found in important and specialized brain regions (such as the oribitofrontal cortex, caudate, fusiform gyrus, and hippocampus). Marked anatomical consistency exists across healthy brains in terms of nodal participation and location of rich club networks. The consistency of connections between integrative areas and specialized brain regions highlights a fundamental connectivity pattern shared among healthy brains. We propose that approaching brain connectivity with this framework of anatomical consistencies may have clinical implications for early detection of individual variability.

Indexed as

ConnectomeModels, NeurologicalAdultBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleNeural Pathwaysconnectomediffusion tensor imaginghub nodesmagnetic resonance imagingrich clubstructural networks

Identifiers

PMID25954161
PMCPMC4405623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.