ArticleInternational journal of mass spectrometry2015
In-Depth Analyses of B Cell Signaling Through Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Phosphopeptides Enriched by PolyMAC.
Article in International journal of mass spectrometry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics in clinical applications.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Article
- Targeted Quantification of Protein Phosphorylation and Its Contributions towards Mathematical Modeling of Signaling Pathways.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Insulin signaling regulates longevity through protein phosphorylation in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Phosphoproteomics Meets Chemical Genetics: Approaches for Global Mapping and Deciphering the Phosphoproteome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Proteomics: a powerful tool to study plant responses to biotic stress.Plant methods · 2019Review
- Identification of Phosphorylated Proteins on a Global Scale.Current protocols in chemical biology · 2018Article
- Review
- Multiplexed Imaging of Protein Phosphorylation on Membranes Based on Ti(IV) Functionalized Nanopolymers.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2016Article
- Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.Analytical chemistry · 2016Review
- The current state of the art of quantitative phosphoproteomics and its applications to diabetes research.Expert review of proteomics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has enabled researchers to analyze complex biological samples since the original concept inception. It facilitates the identification and quantification of modifications within tens of thousands of proteins in a single large-scale proteomic experiment. Phosphorylation analysis, as one of the most common and important post-translational modifications, has particularly benefited from such progress in the field. Here we showcase the technique through in-depth analyses of B cell signaling based on quantitative phosphoproteomics. As a complement to the previously described PolyMAC-Ti (polymer-based metal ion affinity capture using titanium) reagent, we introduce here PolyMAC-Fe, which utilizes a different metal ion, Fe(III). An extensive comparison using the different available MS/MS fragmentations techniques was made between PolyMAC-Fe, PolyMAC-Ti and IMAC (immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography) reagents in terms of specificity, reproducibility and type of phosphopeptides being enriched. PolyMAC-Fe based chelation demonstrated good selectivity and unique specificity toward phosphopeptides, making it useful in specialized applications. We have combined PolyMAC-Ti and PolyMAC-Fe, along with SILAC-based quantitation and large-scale fractionation, for quantitative B cell phosphoproteomic analyses. The complementary approach allowed us to identify a larger percentage of multiply phosphorylated peptides than with PolyMAC-Ti alone. Overall, out of 13,794 unique phosphorylation sites identified, close to 20% were dependent on BCR signaling. These sites were further mapped to a variety of major signaling networks, offering more detailed information about the biochemistry of B cell receptor engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.