ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular interventions2015
Intracoronary delivery of self-assembling heart-derived microtissues (cardiospheres) for prevention of adverse remodeling in a pig model of convalescent myocardial infarction.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topical vascular organoid therapy promotes microvascular regeneration and functional recovery in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathy.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Rapid manufacturing of angiogenic cellular collagen patches for ischemic cardiomyopathy.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring hiPSC-CM replacement therapy in ischemic hearts.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
- Cardiac Tissue Engineering for Translational Cardiology: From In Vitro Models to Regenerative Therapies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-vessel coronary infusion of cardiosphere-derived cells for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a pre-clinical pig model.Basic research in cardiology · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive delivery of therapeutic agents by hydrogel injection into the pericardial cavity for cardiac repair.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Evaluating Novel Targets of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Pig Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Diffusion Tensor Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Reveals Exosomes From Cardiosphere-Derived Cells Preserve Myocardial Fiber Architecture After Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2018Article
- Recent Progress in Stem Cell Modification for Cardiac Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2018Review
- Cortical Bone Stem Cells Administered at Reperfusion Attenuate Remote Zone Myocyte Remodeling.Circulation research · 2017Article
- Intracoronary Administration of Allogeneic Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves Myocardial Perfusion But Not Left Ventricle Function, in a Translational Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Exosomes secreted by cardiosphere-derived cells reduce scarring, attenuate adverse remodelling, and improve function in acute and chronic porcine myocardial infarction.European heart journal · 2017Article
- Translational cardiac stem cell therapy: advancing from first-generation to next-generation cell types.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2017Review
- Microtissues in Cardiovascular Medicine: Regenerative Potential Based on a 3D Microenvironment.Stem cells international · 2016Review
- Letter by Gallet and Marbán Regarding Article, "Intracoronary Injection of Large Stem Cells: Size Matters".Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2015Article
- Cardiosphere-derived cells reverse heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in rats by decreasing fibrosis and inflammation.JACC. Basic to translational scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical studies in rodents and pigs indicate that the self-assembling microtissues known as cardiospheres may be more effective than dispersed cardiosphere-derived cells. However, the more desirable intracoronary route has been assumed to be unsafe for cardiosphere delivery: Cardiospheres are large (30-150 μm), raising concerns about likely microembolization. We questioned these negative assumptions by evaluating the safety and efficacy of optimized intracoronary delivery of cardiospheres in a porcine model of convalescent myocardial infarction. METHODS AND
resultsFirst, we standardized the size of cardiospheres by modifying culture conditions. Then, dosage was determined by infusing escalating doses of cardiospheres in the left anterior descending artery of naive pigs, looking for acute adverse effects. Finally, in a randomized efficacy study, 14 minipigs received allogeneic cardiospheres (1.3 × 10(6)) or vehicle 1 month after myocardial infarction. Animals underwent magnetic resonance imaging before infusion and 1 month later to assess left ventricular ejection fraction, scar mass, and viable mass. In the dosing study, we did not observe any evidence of microembolization after cardiosphere infusion. In the post-myocardial infarction study, cardiospheres preserved LV function, reduced scar mass and increased viable mass, whereas placebo did not. Moreover, cardiosphere decreased collagen content, and increased vessel densities and myocardial perfusion. Importantly, intracoronary cardiospheres decreased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and increased cardiac output.
conclusionsIntracoronary delivery of cardiospheres is safe. Intracoronary cardiospheres are also remarkably effective in decreasing scar, halting adverse remodeling, increasing myocardial perfusion, and improving hemodynamic status after myocardial infarction in pigs. Thus, cardiospheres may be viable therapeutic candidates for intracoronary infusion in selected myocardial disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.