Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953601›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2015

Mindless feeding: Is maternal distraction during bottle-feeding associated with overfeeding?

Rebecca B Golen, Alison K Ventura

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02517970 (Observing Infant Feeding Interactions), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02517970 nacompletednot on this map

Observing Infant Feeding Interactions

TypeinterventionalSponsorCalifornia Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoRan2015 to 2018Enrolled27ConditionsClassical Music, Television ShowArmsTechnology distraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Infant behavioural effects of smartphone interrupted parent-infant interaction.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca B GolenDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 1505 Race Street, Mail Stop 1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.
Alison K VenturaDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Math and Sciences, California Polytechnic University, One Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA. Electronic address: akventur@calpoly.edu.
California Polytechnic State University · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Does knowing the amount of milk in the bottle alter infant feeding practices?R03HD080730 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA POLY STATE U SAN LUIS OBISPO · PI VENTURA, ALISON K. · 2014 to 2015
$143k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD080730NICHD NIH HHS R03HD080730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mindless eating, or eating while distracted by surrounding stimuli, leads to overeating. The present study explored whether "mindless feeding," or maternal distraction during bottle-feeding, is associated with greater infant formula/milk intakes and lower maternal sensitivity to infant cues. Mothers and their ≤24-week-old bottle-feeding infants (N = 28) visited our laboratory for a video-recorded feeding observation. Infant intake was assessed by weighing bottles before and after the feedings. Maternal sensitivity to infant cues was objectively assessed by behavioral coding of video-records using the Nursing Child Assessment Feeding Scale. Maternal distraction was defined as looking away from the infant >75% of the feeding; using a mobile device; conversing with another adult; or sleeping. Twenty-nine percent (n = 8) of mothers were distracted. While differences in intakes for infants of distracted vs. not distracted mothers did not reach significance (p = 0.24), the association between distraction and infant intake was modified by two dimensions of temperament: orienting/regulation capacity (p = 0.03) and surgency/extraversion (p = 0.04). For infants with low orienting/regulation capacity, infants of distracted mothers consumed more (177.1 ± 33.8 ml) than those of not distracted mothers (92.4 ± 13.8 ml). Similar findings were noted for infants with low surgency/extraversion (distracted: 140.6 ± 22.5 ml; not distracted: 78.4 ± 14.3 ml). No association between distraction and intake was seen for infants with high orienting/regulation capacity or surgency/extraversion. A significantly greater proportion of distracted mothers showed low sensitivity to infant cues compared to not distracted mothers (p = 0.04). In sum, mindless feeding may interact with infant characteristics to influence feeding outcomes; further experimental and longitudinal studies are needed.

Indexed as

AttentionBottle FeedingEnergy IntakeInfant BehaviorMaternal BehaviorMindfulnessMothersAdultCuesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleMother-Child RelationsBottle-feedingMindless eatingMindless feedingMother-infant feeding interactionsObesity preventionOverfeeding

Identifiers

PMID25953601
PMCPMC4464819
OpenAlexW220727601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.