Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953595›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2015

Health, Personal, and Environmental Predictors of Wheelchair-Use Confidence in Adult Wheelchair Users.

Brodie M Sakakibara, William C Miller, Janice J Eng, François Routhier, Catherine L Backman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brodie M SakakibaraB.M. Sakakibara, PhD, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
William C MillerW.C. Miller, PhD, FCAOT, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences and Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, T325-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5 Canada, and Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. bcmiller@telus.net.
Janice J EngJ.J. Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, and Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute.
François RouthierF. Routhier, PEng, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Catherine L BackmanC.L. Backman, PhD, FCAOT, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences and Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia.
GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research IAP-107848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no predictive models of wheelchair-use confidence. Therefore, clinicians and researchers are limited in their ability to screen for and identify wheelchair users who may be more prone to low wheelchair-use confidence and may benefit from clinical intervention.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify health-related, personal, and environmental factors that predict perceived wheelchair-use confidence in community-dwelling adults who use manual wheelchairs.

designA cross-sectional study was conducted.

methodsCommunity-dwelling manual wheelchair users (N=124) were included in the study if they were ≥50 years of age, had ≥6 months of wheelchair use experience, and had no cognitive impairment. The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale was used to assess wheelchair-use confidence. The sociodemographic information form, Functional Comorbidity Index, Seating Identification Tool, Interpersonal Support and Evaluation List, and Home and Community Environment Instrument captured the independent variables. Blocks of health, personal, and environmental variables were sequentially entered into the regression model.

resultsFive personal variables (age, standardized beta [β]=-0.18; sex, β=-0.26; daily hours of wheelchair occupancy, β=0.20; wheelchair-use training, β=0.20; and wheelchair-use assistance, β=-0.34) and one environmental variable (need for seating intervention, β=-0.18) were statistically significant predictors, explaining 44% of the confidence variance. LIMITATIONS: The sample comprised volunteers and, therefore, may underrepresent or overrepresent particular groups within the population. The study's cross-sectional research design does not allow for conclusions to be made regarding causality.

conclusionOlder women who use wheelchairs and who require assistance with wheelchair use may have low wheelchair-use confidence. The same is true for individuals who have no formal wheelchair-use training, who are in need of a seating intervention, and who report few hours of daily wheelchair use. These wheelchair users may require clinical attention and benefit from intervention.

Indexed as

Environment DesignHealth StatusSelf ConceptSocial EnvironmentAgedAge FactorsCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesRegression AnalysisSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID25953595
PMCPMC4595810
OpenAlexW2262965743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.