Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953390›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015

Stratification of HPV-induced cervical pathology using the virally encoded molecular marker E4 in combination with p16 or MCM.

Heather Griffin, Yasmina Soneji, Romy Van Baars, Rupali Arora, David Jenkins, Miekel van de Sandt, Zhonglin Wu, Wim Quint, Robert Jach, Krzysztof Okon and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05049252 (Performance of HPV E4 and p16INK4a Biomarkers in Predicting Risk of Regression Among Women Diagnosed With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05049252 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Performance of HPV E4 and p16INK4a Biomarkers in Predicting Risk of Regression Among Women Diagnosed With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2): a Historical Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2020 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsCervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. HPV in oropharyngeal squamous papillomas: a missing link in head and neck viral pathogenesis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Thymopoietin-The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Characterization of cervical biopsies of women with HIV and HPV co-infection using p16Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Heather Griffin1] Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK [2] National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Yasmina SonejiNational Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Romy Van BaarsDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Rupali AroraUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
David JenkinsDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Miekel van de SandtDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Zhonglin WuNational Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Wim QuintDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Robert JachDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University College, Krakow, Poland.
Krzysztof OkonDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University College, Krakow, Poland.
Hubert HurasDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University College, Krakow, Poland.
Albert SingerUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
John Doorbar1] Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK [2] National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
DDL Diagnostic Laboratory · NLJagiellonian University · PLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13050Medical Research Council MC_U117584278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types cause cervical lesions of varying severity, ranging from transient productive infections to high-grade neoplasia. Disease stratification requires the examination of lesional pathology, and possibly also the detection of biomarkers. P16(INK4a) and MCM are established surrogates of high-risk HPV E6/E7 activity, and can be extensively expressed in high-grade lesions. Here we have combined these two cellular biomarkers with detection of the abundant HPV-encoded E4 protein in order to identify both productive and transforming lesions. This approach has allowed us to distinguish true papillomavirus infections from similar pathologies, and has allowed us to divide the heterogeneous CIN2 category into those that are CIN1-like and express E4, and those that more closely resemble nonproductive CIN3. To achieve this, 530 lesional areas were evaluated according to standard pathology criteria and by using a multiple staining approach that allows us to superimpose biomarker patterns either singly or in combination onto an annotated hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) image. Conventional grading of neoplasia was established by review panel, and compared directly with the composite molecular pathology visualized on the same tissue section. The detection of E4 coincided with the onset of vacuolation, becoming abundant in koilocytes as the MCM marker declined and cells lost their defined nuclear margins as visualized by standard H&E staining. Of the dual marker approaches, p16(INK4a) and E4 appeared most promising, with E4 generally identifying areas of low-grade disease even when p16(INK4a) was present. Extensive p16(INK4a) expression usually coincided with an absence of E4 expression or its focal retention in sporadic cells within the lesion. Our results suggest that a straightforward molecular evaluation of HPV life-cycle deregulation in cervical neoplasia may help improve disease stratification, and that this can be achieved using complementary molecular biomarker pairs such as MCM/E4 or, more promisingly, p16(INK4a)/E4 as an adjunct to conventional pathology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCervix UteriCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16oncogene protein E4, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, Viral

Identifiers

PMID25953390
PMCPMC4489599
OpenAlexW1529281684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.