Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953380›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Impact and management of chemotherapy/radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and the perceptual gap between oncologists/oncology nurses and patients: a cross-sectional multinational survey.

Cheryl Vidall, Paz Fernández-Ortega, Diego Cortinovis, Patrick Jahn, Bharat Amlani, Florian Scotté

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2023 Updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus Recommendations: prevention of radiotherapy- and chemoradiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. A phase III study of transdermal granisetron versus oral ondansetron for women with gynecologic cancers receiving pelvic chemoradiation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Chemotherapy: how to reduce its adverse effects while maintaining the potency?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in the real-world setting in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of antiemetic practices for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): results of a European oncology nurse survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent advances in antiemetics: new formulations of 5HTCancer management and research · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Cheryl VidallAlcura, Selborne House, Mill Lane, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 2QJ, UK.
Paz Fernández-OrtegaCatalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
Diego CortinovisAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerado, Via Pergolesi, 33, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Patrick JahnUniversity Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 30, 06097, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Bharat AmlaniNorgine Ltd, Norgine House, Widewater Place, Moorhall Road, Uxbridge, UB9 6NS, UK. bamlani@norgine.com.
Florian ScottéMedical Oncology and Supportive Care Cancer Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20 Rue Leblanc, 750175, Paris, France.
Duran i Reynals Hospital · ESHôpital Européen · FRNorgine (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy/radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV/RINV) can affect half of oncology patients, significantly impacting daily life. Nausea without vomiting has only recently been thought of as a condition in its own right. As such, the incidence of nausea is often underestimated. This survey investigated the incidence and impact of CINV/RINV in patients compared with estimations of physicians/oncology nurses to determine if there is a perceptual gap between healthcare professionals and patients.

methodsAn online research survey of physicians, oncology nurses and patients was conducted across five European countries. Participants had to have experience prescribing/recommending or have received anti-emetic medication for CINV/RINV treatment. Questionnaires assessed the incidence and impact of CINV/RINV, anti-emetic usage and compliance, and attribute importance of anti-emetic medication.

resultsA total of 947 (375 physicians, 186 oncology nurses and 386 patients) participated in this survey. The incidence of nausea was greater than vomiting: 60 % of patients reported nausea alone, whereas 18 % reported vomiting. Physicians and oncology nurses overestimated the incidence of CINV/RINV but underestimated its impact on patients' daily lives. Only 38 % of patients reported full compliance with physicians'/oncology nurses' guidelines when self-administering anti-emetic medication. Leading factors for poor compliance included reluctance to add to a pill burden and fear that swallowing itself would induce nausea/vomiting.

conclusionsThere is a perceptual gap between healthcare professionals and patients in terms of the incidence and impact of CINV/RINV. This may lead to sub-optimal prescription of anti-emetics and therefore management of CINV/RINV. Minimising the pill burden and eliminating the requirement to swallow medication could improve poor patient compliance with anti-emetic regimens.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansIncidenceInduction ChemotherapyMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedNauseaOncology NursingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAnti-emeticChemotherapy/radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingImpactIncidencePerceptual gap

Identifiers

PMID25953380
PMCPMC4584113
OpenAlexW327570834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.