Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953358›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Differential Involvement of the Agranular vs Granular Insular Cortex in the Acquisition and Performance of Choice Behavior in a Rodent Gambling Task.

Abhiram Pushparaj, Aaron S Kim, Martin Musiol, Abraham Zangen, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Martin Zack, Catharine A Winstanley, Bernard Le Foll

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gambling disorder: an integrative review of animal and human studies.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. A biopsychological review of gambling disorder.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhiram PushparajTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON, Canada.
Aaron S KimTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON, Canada.
Martin MusiolTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abraham ZangenDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
Zafiris J DaskalakisCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Martin ZackCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Catharine A WinstanleyDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bernard Le FollTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CABen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance-related and addictive disorders, in particular gambling disorder, are known to be associated with risky decision-making behavior. Several neuroimaging studies have identified the involvement of the insular cortex in decision-making under risk. However, the extent of this involvement remains unclear and the specific contributions of two distinct insular subregions, the rostral agranular (RAIC) and the caudal granular (CGIC), have yet to be examined. Animals were trained to perform a rat gambling task (rGT), in which subjects chose between four options that differed in the magnitude and probability of rewards and penalties. In order to address the roles of the RAIC and CGIC in established choice behavior, pharmacological inactivations of these two subregions via local infusions of GABA receptor agonists were performed following 30 rGT training sessions. The contribution made by the RAIC or CGIC to the acquisition of choice behavior was also determined by lesioning these areas before behavioral training. Inactivation of the RAIC, but not of the CGIC, shifted rats' preference toward options with greater reward frequency and lower punishment. Before rGT acquisition, lesions of the RAIC, but not the CGIC, likewise resulted in a higher preference for options with greater reward frequency and lower punishment, and this persisted throughout the 30 training sessions. Our results provide confirmation of the involvement of the RAIC in rGT choice behavior and suggest that the RAIC may mediate detrimental risky decision-making behavior, such as that associated with addiction and gambling disorder.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsCerebral CortexChoice BehaviorDecision MakingExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsGABA AgonistsGamblingIbotenic AcidMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeReinforcement, PsychologyExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsGABA AgonistsIbotenic Acid

Identifiers

PMID25953358
PMCPMC4864659
OpenAlexW1521332763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.