Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953357›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Role of GABA Deficit in Sensitivity to the Psychotomimetic Effects of Amphetamine.

Kyung-Heup Ahn, Andrew Sewell, Jacqueline Elander, Brian Pittman, Mohini Ranganathan, Handan Gunduz-Bruce, John Krystal, Deepak Cyril D'Souza

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kyung-Heup AhnPsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Andrew SewellPsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Jacqueline ElanderPsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Brian PittmanAbraham Ribicoff Research Facilities, Connecticut Mental Health Center, West Haven, CT, USA.
Mohini RanganathanPsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Handan Gunduz-BrucePsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
John KrystalPsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Deepak Cyril D'SouzaPsychiatry Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USConnecticut Mental Health Center · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some schizophrenia patients are more sensitive to amphetamine (AMPH)-induced exacerbations in psychosis-an effect that correlates with higher striatal dopamine release. This enhanced vulnerability may be related to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) deficits observed in schizophrenia. We hypothesized that a pharmacologically induced GABA deficit would create vulnerability to the psychotomimetic effects to the 'subthreshold' dose of AMPH in healthy subjects, which by itself would not induce clinically significant increase in positive symptoms. To test this hypothesis, a GABA deficit was induced by intravenous infusion of iomazenil (IOM; 3.7 μg/kg), an antagonist and partial inverse agonist of benzodiazepine receptor. A subthreshold dose of AMPH (0.1 mg/kg) was administered by intravenous infusion. Healthy subjects received placebo IOM followed by placebo AMPH, active IOM followed by placebo AMPH, placebo IOM followed by active AMPH, and active IOM followed by active AMPH in a randomized, double-blind crossover design over 4 test days. Twelve healthy subjects who had a subclinical response to active AMPH alone were included in the analysis. Psychotomimetic effects (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)), perceptual alterations (Clinician Administered Dissociative Symptoms Scale (CADSS)), and subjective effects (visual analog scale) were captured before and after the administration of drugs. IOM significantly augmented AMPH-induced peak changes in PANSS positive symptom subscale and both subjective and objective CADSS scores. There were no pharmacokinetic interactions. In conclusion, GABA deficits increased vulnerability to amphetamine-induced psychosis-relevant effects in healthy subjects, suggesting that pre-existing GABA deficits may explain why a subgroup of schizophrenia patients are vulnerable to AMPH.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmphetamineCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFlumazenilgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHallucinogensHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersTime FactorsAmphetamineFlumazenilgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHallucinogensiomazenil

Identifiers

PMID25953357
PMCPMC4864658
OpenAlexW1600216088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.