ArticleLasers in medical science2015
A comparative study of the effects of different low-level lasers on the proliferation, viability, and migration of human melanocytes in vitro.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boosting osteoblast differentiation: enhancing the effects of low-level blue laser therapy on human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells to improve viability and calcium deposition.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Influence of Low-Level Red Laser Irradiation on the Proliferation, Viability, and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of Polymeric Micelles for Combined Delivery of Luteolin and Doxorubicin for Cancer Therapy.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Stimulatory effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Effect of Different Wavelengths of Laser Irradiation on the Skin Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Assessing Phototoxicity in a Mammalian Cell Line: How Low Levels of Blue Light Affect Motility in PC3 Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- ZMIZ1 promotes the proliferation and migration of melanocytes in vitiligo.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Under the spotlight: mechanisms of photobiomodulation concentrating on blue and green light.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2019Article
- Ultra-structural effects of different low-level lasers on normal cultured human melanocytes: an in vitro comparative study.Lasers in medical science · 2016Article
- Effects of low-level laser irradiation on proliferation and functional protein expression in human RPE cells.Lasers in medical science · 2015Article
- Proposed Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation or Low-Level Light Therapy.IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics : a publication of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different low-level laser therapies (LLLTs) of various wavelengths and energies on normal cultured human melanocytes. Various studies have shown the effects of LLLs on various types of cultured cells. Presently, little is known about the biological effects of LLLTs on melanocytes. Melanocytes were exposed to LLLT at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, or 5.0 J/cm(2) using a blue (457 nm), red (635 nm), or ultraviolet (UV) (355 nm) laser. Melanocyte viability, proliferation, and migration were monitored at 72 h after irradiation. The blue (P < 0.001) and red (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) lasers significantly enhanced viability at 0.5 to 2.0 J/cm(2), whereas the UV laser (P < 0.001) could significantly enhance viability only at 0.5 and 1.0 J/cm(2) compared with controls. The blue and red lasers also significantly enhanced the proliferation of the melanocytes at 0.5 to 2.0 J/cm(2) (P < 0.001), and the UV laser significantly enhanced proliferation at 0.5 to 1.5 J/cm(2) (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) compared with controls. The blue laser significantly enhanced melanocyte migration at 0.5 to 4.0 J/cm(2) (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05), but the red (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) and UV (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05) lasers could significantly enhance such migration at 0.5 to 1.0 J/cm(2) and 0.5 to 2.0 J/cm(2), respectively, compared with controls. LLLT at low energy densities is able to significantly increase melanocyte viability, proliferation, and migration in vitro, and at higher energy densities, it gives non-stimulatory results. Additionally, the blue laser was the best among the three lasers. These findings might have potential application in vitiligo treatment in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25953314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.