Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953311›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2015

An extended combinatorial 15N, 13Cα, and 13C' labeling approach to protein backbone resonance assignment.

Frank Löhr, Franz Tumulka, Christoph Bock, Rupert Abele, Volker Dötsch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank LöhrInstitute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany.
Franz Tumulka
Christoph Bock
Rupert Abele
Volker Dötsch

Funding

Synthetic Antigen Binder CoreU54GM087519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ZHOU, MING · 2010 to 2017
$31.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM087519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solution NMR studies of α-helical membrane proteins are often complicated by severe spectral crowding. In addition, hydrophobic environments like detergent micelles, isotropic bicelles or nanodiscs lead to considerably reduced molecular tumbling rates which translates into line-broadening and low sensitivity. Both difficulties can be addressed by selective isotope labeling methods. In this publication, we propose a combinatorial protocol that utilizes four different classes of labeled amino acids, in which the three backbone heteronuclei (amide nitrogen, α-carbon and carbonyl carbon) are enriched in (15)N or (13)C isotopes individually as well as simultaneously. This results in eight different combinations of dipeptides giving rise to cross peaks in (1)H-(15)N correlated spectra. Their differentiation is achieved by recording a series of HN-detected 2D triple-resonance spectra. The utility of this new scheme is demonstrated with a homodimeric 142-residue membrane protein in DHPC micelles. Restricting the number of selectively labeled samples to three allowed the identification of the amino-acid type for 77 % and provided sequential information for 47 % of its residues. This enabled us to complete the backbone resonance assignment of the uniformly labeled protein merely with the help of a 3D HNCA spectrum, which can be collected with reasonable sensitivity even for relatively large, non-deuterated proteins.

Indexed as

Carbon IsotopesMembrane ProteinsNitrogen IsotopesNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein Structure, SecondaryCarbon IsotopesMembrane ProteinsNitrogen Isotopes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.