ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2015
An extended combinatorial 15N, 13Cα, and 13C' labeling approach to protein backbone resonance assignment.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amino-acid selective isotope labeling enables simultaneous overlapping signal decomposition and information extraction from NMR spectra.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2020Article
- CombLabel: rational design of optimized sequence-specific combinatorial labeling schemes. Application to backbone assignment of membrane proteins with low stability.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2019Article
- Reconstitution and NMR Characterization of the Ion-Channel Accessory Subunit Barttin in Detergents and Lipid-Bilayer Nanodiscs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
- Structural and functional insights into the interaction and targeting hub TMD0 of the polypeptide transporter TAPL.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- NMR assignments of sparsely labeled proteins using a genetic algorithm.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2017Article
- From Nanodiscs to Isotropic Bicelles: A Procedure for Solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Detergent-Sensitive Integral Membrane Proteins.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Solution NMR studies of α-helical membrane proteins are often complicated by severe spectral crowding. In addition, hydrophobic environments like detergent micelles, isotropic bicelles or nanodiscs lead to considerably reduced molecular tumbling rates which translates into line-broadening and low sensitivity. Both difficulties can be addressed by selective isotope labeling methods. In this publication, we propose a combinatorial protocol that utilizes four different classes of labeled amino acids, in which the three backbone heteronuclei (amide nitrogen, α-carbon and carbonyl carbon) are enriched in (15)N or (13)C isotopes individually as well as simultaneously. This results in eight different combinations of dipeptides giving rise to cross peaks in (1)H-(15)N correlated spectra. Their differentiation is achieved by recording a series of HN-detected 2D triple-resonance spectra. The utility of this new scheme is demonstrated with a homodimeric 142-residue membrane protein in DHPC micelles. Restricting the number of selectively labeled samples to three allowed the identification of the amino-acid type for 77 % and provided sequential information for 47 % of its residues. This enabled us to complete the backbone resonance assignment of the uniformly labeled protein merely with the help of a 3D HNCA spectrum, which can be collected with reasonable sensitivity even for relatively large, non-deuterated proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25953311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.