Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25953281›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

Ecological and Genetic Barriers Differentiate Natural Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Katie J Clowers, Justin Heilberger, Jeff S Piotrowski, Jessica L Will, Audrey P Gasch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Open biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie J ClowersLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Justin HeilbergerLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Jeff S PiotrowskiGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Madison, WI.
Jessica L WillLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Audrey P GaschLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Madison, WI agasch@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USGreat Lakes Bioenergy Research Center · US

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NHGRI NIH HHS T32HG002760NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007133NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007133-36NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007133-39
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How populations that inhabit the same geographical area become genetically differentiated is not clear. To investigate this, we characterized phenotypic and genetic differences between two populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that in some cases inhabit the same environment but show relatively little gene flow. We profiled stress sensitivity in a group of vineyard isolates and a group of oak-soil strains and found several niche-related phenotypes that distinguish the populations. We performed bulk-segregant mapping on two of the distinguishing traits: The vineyard-specific ability to grow in grape juice and oak-specific tolerance to the cell wall damaging drug Congo red. To implicate causal genes, we also performed a chemical genomic screen in the lab-strain deletion collection and identified many important genes that fell under quantitative trait loci peaks. One gene important for growth in grape juice and identified by both the mapping and the screen was SSU1, a sulfite-nitrite pump implicated in wine fermentations. The beneficial allele is generated by a known translocation that we reasoned may also serve as a genetic barrier. We found that the translocation is prevalent in vineyard strains, but absent in oak strains, and presents a postzygotic barrier to spore viability. Furthermore, the translocation was associated with a fitness cost to the rapid growth rate seen in oak-soil strains. Our results reveal the translocation as a dual-function locus that enforces ecological differentiation while producing a genetic barrier to gene flow in these sympatric populations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnion Transport ProteinsEcosystemFermentationGenes, FungalGenetic PleiotropyLod ScorePhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociQuercusSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyVitisAnion Transport ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSsu1 protein, S cerevisiaeecological divergenceenvironmental stressgenetic incompatibilitiesquantitative trait mappingreproductive isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID25953281
PMCPMC4540968
OpenAlexW2106709887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.