ArticleEye (London, England)2015
Clinical characteristics of responders to intravitreal bevacizumab in central serous chorioretinopathy patients.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for the treatment of chronic central serous retinopathy: a meta-analysis of the literature.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Pooled it
- Choroidal Response to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections in Treatment-Naïve Macular Neovascularization Secondary to Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Exosomal miR-184 in the aqueous humor of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy: a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Efficacy of Spironolactone for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Long-term treatment response after intravitreal bevacizumab injections for patients with central serous chorioretinopathy.PloS one · 2020Article
- The Efficacy of Intravitreal Conbercept for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Photodynamic therapy in combination with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept injection in patients with chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute central serous chorioretinopathy: a single-center retrospective study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- Factors affecting the visual outcome in acute central serous chorioretinopathy.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Central serous chorioretinopathy: Treatment.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Spironolactone Therapy in Patients with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate factors associated with good response to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) patients.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 42 eyes of CSC patients of symptom duration more than 3 months who received a single or multiple successive IVBs on an as-needed basis (0.05 ml, 1.25 mg). High responders (HRs) were defined as complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Moderate responders (MRs) were defined as SRF resolution of 50-99% of pretreatment volume and poor responders (PRs) as SRF resolution <50%. Clinical, SD-OCT, fluorescein, and indocyanine green angiography findings were analyzed to find factors associated with HR. Descriptive statistics for all demographic and clinical variables were calculated, and comparisons were made using Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-rank test, the Mann-Whitney U-test for means with continuous data, Pearson's χ(2) test, and Fisher's exact test for categorical data.
resultsThe mean number of IVB was 1.9. At postoperative 1 month, there were 10 (24%) HRs, 18 (43%) MRs, and 14 (33%) PRs. At the last follow-up (the mean 8.6 months), there were 25 HRs (60%), 9 MRs (21%), and 8 PRs (19%). Thicker subfoveal choroid (P=0.036), smaller lesion diameter (P=0.019), and better baseline best-corrected visual acuity (P=0.002) predicted HRs at postoperative 1 month. HR at the last follow-up was associated with classic pattern fluorescein angiography finding.
conclusionsSuboptimal effects of IVB on persistent CSC suggest primary IVB on selective cases with better vision, smaller lesion, and thicker choroid at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.