Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25952941›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2016

Measuring Nutrition Literacy in Breast Cancer Patients: Development of a Novel Instrument.

Heather D Gibbs, Edward F Ellerbeck, Christie Befort, Byron Gajewski, Amy R Kennett, Qing Yu, Danielle Christifano, Debra K Sullivan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03978312 (Implications of Nutrition Health Literacy on Accessibility and Engagement With Nutrition Information in Cancer Patients and Their Support Networks), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03978312 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Implications of Nutrition Health Literacy on Accessibility and Engagement With Nutrition Information in Cancer Patients and Their Support Networks

TypeobservationalSponsorNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2019 to 2020Enrolled58ConditionsCancer, Oncologic Disorders, Haematological Malignancy, Nutrition Aspect of CancerArmsNominal consensus group, Observational cohort (validity and reliability testing)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Health Literacy in Surgery.Health literacy research and practice · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather D GibbsDepartment of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66208, USA. hgibbs@kumc.edu.
Edward F EllerbeckDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Christie BefortDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Byron GajewskiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Amy R KennettDepartment of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66208, USA.
Qing YuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Danielle ChristifanoDepartment of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66208, USA.
Debra K SullivanDepartment of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Mail Stop 4013, Kansas City, KS, 66208, USA.

Funding

Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No nutrition literacy instruments have been tested in breast cancer survivors, yet nutrition is a critical lifestyle factor for optimizing weight and improving quality of life in breast cancer survival. Our objectives were to adapt our Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for breast cancer populations and to pilot test its validity and reliability. We modified the instrument based on review by content experts in cancer and nutrition and cognitive interviews with 18 cancer survivors. The modified instrument (Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for Breast Cancer, NLit-BCa) was pilot-tested with 17 high-risk women and 55 breast cancer survivors. We conducted the NLit-BCa on two separate occasions 4 weeks apart and assessed reliability by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing results of the NLit-BCa to a Healthy Eating Index score derived from two separate 24-h dietary recalls. Content validity of the NLit-BCa was acceptable (0.93). Entire reliability for three instrument domains was substantial (>0.80), while remaining domains demonstrated fair or moderate reliability. Significant relationships were found between five of the six domains of nutrition literacy and diet quality (P < 0.05). The NLit-BCa is content valid and demonstrates promising reliability and construct validity related to diet quality, through a larger sample size, and removal of non-discriminating items is needed to confirm these findings. Thus, the NLit-BCa demonstrates potential for comprehensively measuring nutrition literacy in breast cancer populations.

Indexed as

DietHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritional StatusPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMiddle AgedNutrition AssessmentPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth educationHealth literacyNutrition therapy education

Identifiers

PMID25952941
PMCPMC4639469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.