Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25952935›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2015

Impact of anesthesia and storage on posttranslational modifications of cardiac myofilament proteins.

Megan S Utter, Chad M Warren, R John Solaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Best practices in assessing cardiac proteinAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan S UtterDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Cardiovascular Research, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Chad M WarrenDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Cardiovascular Research, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
R John SolaroDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Cardiovascular Research, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois solarorj@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Sarcomeric Modifications and Progressive Cardiac MaladaptationP01HL062426 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SOLARO, R JOHN · 2000 to 2020
$42.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL062426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although high fidelity measurements of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of cardiac myofilament proteins exist, important issues remain regarding basic techniques of sample acquisition and storage. We investigated the effects of anesthetic regimen and sample storage conditions on PTMs of major ventricular sarcomeric proteins. Mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (Nembutal), ketamine/xylazine mixture (Ket/Xyl), or tribromoethanol (Avertin), and the ventricular tissue was prepared and stored for 1, 7, 30, 60, or 90 days at -80°C. Myofilament protein phosphorylation and glutathionylation were analyzed by Pro-Q Diamond stain and Western blotting, respectively. With up to 7 days of storage, phosphorylation of troponin T was stable for samples from mice anesthetized with either Nembutal or Ket/Xyl but not Avertin; while myosin-binding protein C (MyBP-C) phosphorylation was reduced at 7 days with Nembutal and Ket/Xyl, though generally not significant until 90 days. Tropomyosin and regulatory myosin light chain phosphorylation were stable for up to 7 days regardless of the anesthetic regimen employed. In the case of Troponin I, by 7 days of storage there was a significant fall in phosphorylation across all anesthetics. Storage of samples from 30 to 90 days resulted in a general decrease in myofilament phosphorylation independent of the anesthetic. S-glutathionylation of MyBP-C presented a trend in reduced glutathionylation from days 30-90 in all anesthetics, with only day 90 being statistically significant. Our findings suggest that there are alterations in PTMs of major myofilament proteins from both storage and anesthetic selection, and that storage beyond 30 days will likely result in distortion of data.

Indexed as

Anestheticcardiac myofilamentsposttranslational modificationsstorage

Identifiers

PMID25952935
PMCPMC4463824
OpenAlexW2120600360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.