Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25952652›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015

A Digital Ethnography of Medical Students who Use Twitter for Professional Development.

Katherine C Chretien, Matthew G Tuck, Michael Simon, Lisa O Singh, Terry Kind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Disruption in the space-time continuum: why digital ethnography matters.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2022
    Review
  15. Social Media: Flattening Hierarchies for Women and Black, Indigenous, People Of Color (BIPOC) to Enter the Room Where It Happens.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Harnessing the Power of Medical Twitter for Mentorship.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine C ChretienWashington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20422, USA. Katherine.Chretien@va.gov.
Matthew G TuckWashington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 50 Irving Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20422, USA.
Michael SimonSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Lisa O SinghGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Terry KindSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile researchers have studied negative professional consequences of medical trainee social media use, little is known about how medical students informally use social media for education and career development. This knowledge may help future and current physicians succeed in the digital age.

objectiveWe aimed to explore how and why medical students use Twitter for professional development.

designThis was a digital ethnography.

participantsMedical student "superusers" of Twitter participated in the study APPROACH: The postings ("tweets") of 31 medical student superusers were observed for 8 months (May-December 2013), and structured field notes recorded. Through purposive sampling, individual key informant interviews were conducted to explore Twitter use and values until thematic saturation was reached (ten students). Three faculty key informant interviews were also conducted. Ego network and subnetwork analysis of student key informants was performed. Qualitative analysis included inductive coding of field notes and interviews, triangulation of data, and analytic memos in an iterative process. KEY

resultsTwitter served as a professional tool that supplemented the traditional medical school experience. Superusers approached their use of Twitter with purpose and were mindful of online professionalism as well as of being good Twitter citizens. Their tweets reflected a mix of personal and professional content. Student key informants had a high number of followers. The subnetwork of key informants was well-connected, showing evidence of a social network versus information network. Twitter provided value in two major domains: access and voice. Students gained access to information, to experts, to a variety of perspectives including patient and public perspectives, and to communities of support. They also gained a platform for advocacy, control of their digital footprint, and a sense of equalization within the medical hierarchy.

conclusionsTwitter can serve as a professional tool that supplements traditional education. Students' practices and guiding principles can serve as best practices for other students as well as faculty.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAnthropology, CulturalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSocial MediaStudents, MedicalUnited Statesinternetprofessional developmentsocial mediatwitterundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID25952652
PMCPMC4617937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.