Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2015
A centralized cardiovascular risk service to improve guideline adherence in private primary care offices.
Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01983813 (Improved Cardiovascular Risk Reduction to Enhance Rural Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improved Cardiovascular Risk Reduction to Enhance Rural Primary Care
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pharmacist intervention for monitoring and treating hypertension using bidirectional texting: PharmText BP.Contemporary clinical trials · 2020Trial
- Cluster-Randomized Trial to Evaluate a Centralized Clinical Pharmacy Service in Private Family Medicine Offices.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2018Trial
- Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Trial
- A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Centralized Clinical Pharmacy Cardiovascular Risk Service to Improve Guideline Adherence.Pharmacotherapy · 2015Trial
- Dissemination of a telehealth cardiovascular risk service: The CVRS live protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2021Article
- Article
- Team-Based Care with Pharmacists to Improve Blood Pressure: a Review of Recent Literature.Current hypertension reports · 2018Review
- Avoiding Pitfalls With Implementation of Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trials: Strategies to Achieve Milestones.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Review
- Development of a centralized, remote clinical pharmacy service to enhance primary care.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany large health systems now employ clinical pharmacists in team-based care to assist patients and physicians with management of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. However, small private offices often lack the resources to hire a clinical pharmacist for their office. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a centralized, web-based CV risk service (CVRS) managed by clinical pharmacists will improve guideline adherence in primary care medical offices in rural and small communities.
methodsThis study is a cluster randomized prospective trial in 12 primary care offices. Medical offices were randomized to either the CVRS intervention or usual care. The intervention will last for 12 months and all subjects will have research visits at baseline and 12 months. Primary outcomes will include adherence to treatment guidelines and control of key CV risk factors. Data will also be abstracted from the medical record at 30 months to determine if the intervention effect is sustained after it is discontinued.
conclusionsThis study will enroll subjects through 2015 and results will be available in 2018. This study will provide information on whether a distant, centralized CV risk service can improve guideline adherence in medical offices that lack the resources to employ clinical pharmacists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.