Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25952437›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2015

Balancing the risks and benefits associated with cosmetic dentistry - a joint statement by UK specialist dental societies.

A Alani, M Kelleher, K Hemmings, M Saunders, M Hunter, S Barclay, M Ashley, S Djemal, K Bishop, U Darbar and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A AlaniKings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RW.
M KelleherBritish Society for Restorative Dentistry and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RW.
K HemmingsBritish Society for Restorative Dentistry and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Eastman Dental Hospital, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8LD.
M SaundersBritish Endodontic Society and Specialist in Endodontics, Eastman Dental Hospital, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8LD.
M HunterBritish Endodontic Society and Specialist in Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, M15 6FH.
S BarclayRestorative Dentistry UK Consultant and Specialist Group and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle Dental Hospital, NE2 4AZ.
M AshleyRestorative Dentistry UK Consultant and Specialist Group and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Manchester Dental Hospital, M15 6FH.
S DjemalDental Trauma UK and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RW.
K BishopBritish Society for Restorative Dentistry, Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL.
U DarbarRestorative Dentistry UK Consultant and Specialist Group and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Eastman Dental Hospital, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8LD.
P BriggsBritish Society of Prosthodontics and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry St Georges Hospital, London, SW17 0QT.
J FearneBritish Society for Paediatric Dentistry and Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry at Queen Mary's University, Bart's and the London NHS Trust, E1 1BB Joint statement by British Endodontic Society, British Society for Restorative Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry UK, Dental Trauma UK, British Society of Prosthodontics, British Society for Paediatric Dentistry.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cosmetic dentistry has become increasingly popular, largely as a result of social trends and increased media coverage. This understandable desire for the alleged 'perfect smile' needs to be tempered with an appropriate awareness of the significant risks associated with invasive cosmetic procedures such as veneers and crowns. Patients need to be properly informed that elective removal of healthy enamel and dentine can result in pulpal injury and poorer periodontal health in the longer term, particularly if they are young. The duty of candour means that they ought to be informed that aggressive reduction of sound tooth tissue is not biologically neutral and results in structural weakening of their teeth. Less invasive procedures such as bleaching on its own or for example, combined with direct resin composite bonding, can satisfy many patient's demands, while still being kinder to teeth and having much better fall-back positions for their future requirements. It is the opinion of the British Endodontic Society, British Society for Restorative Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry UK, Dental Trauma UK, British Society of Prosthodontics and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry that elective invasive cosmetic dental treatments can result in great benefit to patients, but that some aggressive treatments used to achieve them can produce significant morbidities in teeth which were previously healthy. This is a worrying and growing problem with many ethical, legal and biologic aspects, but many adverse outcomes for patients who request cosmetic dental improvements are preventable by using biologically safer initial approaches to treatment planning and its provision.

Indexed as

Esthetics, DentalAdolescentAge FactorsComposite ResinsCrownsDental CareDental VeneersHumansRisk AssessmentSocieties, DentalTerminology as TopicTooth BleachingUnited KingdomComposite Resins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.