Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25952280›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Should PET/CT be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A prospective analysis.

Jon Cacicedo, Iratxe Fernandez, Olga Del Hoyo, Ainara Dolado, Javier Gómez-Suarez, Eduardo Hortelano, Aintzane Sancho, Jose I Pijoan, Julio Alvarez, Jose M Espinosa and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multicenter Trial of [Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. FDG PET Hybrid Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Benefit of [18F]-FDG PET/CT for treatment-naïve nasopharyngeal carcinoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  6. Impact of pretreatment second lookClinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. PET/CT prior to salvage surgery in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Article
  10. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Evaluation of the Clinically N0 Neck in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of PET/CT on Staging and Treatment of Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake value measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  16. Utility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients suspected of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome: importance of risk classification.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jon CacicedoRadiation Oncology Department, Cruces University Hospital, c/Plaza de Cruces s/n, 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia (Basque Country), Spain, jon.cacicedofernandezbobadilla@osakidetza.net.
Iratxe Fernandez
Olga Del Hoyo
Ainara Dolado
Javier Gómez-Suarez
Eduardo Hortelano
Aintzane Sancho
Jose I Pijoan
Julio Alvarez
Jose M Espinosa
Ayman Gaafar
Pedro Bilbao
Hospital de Cruces · ESBioCruces Health research Institute · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to determine the incremental staging information provided by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and its impact on management plans in patients with untreated stage III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

methodsWe prospectively studied, between September 2011 and February 2013, 84 consecutive patients [median age 63.5 years (39-84); 73 men] with histologically confirmed HNSCC. First, based on a conventional work-up (physical examination, CT imaging of the head, neck and chest), the multidisciplinary Head and Neck Tumour Board documented the TNM stage and a management plan for each patient, outlining the modalities to be used, including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy or a combination. After release of the PET/CT results, new TNM staging and management plans were agreed on by the multidisciplinary Tumour Board. Any changes in stage or intended management due to the PET/CT findings were then analysed. The impact on patient management was classified as: low (treatment modality, delivery and intent unchanged), moderate (change within the same treatment modality: type of surgery, radiation technique/dose) or high (change in treatment intent and/or treatment modality → curative to palliative, or surgery to chemoradiation or detection of unknown primary tumour or a synchronous second primary tumour). TNM stage was validated by histopathological analysis, additional imaging or follow-up. Accuracy of the conventional and PET/CT-based staging was compared using McNemar's test.

resultsConventional and PET/CT stages were discordant in 32/84 (38 %) cases: the T stage in 2/32 (6.2 %), the N stage in 21/32 (65.7 %) and the M stage 9/32 (28.1 %). Patient management was altered in 22/84 (26 %) patients, with a moderate impact in 8 (9.5 %) patients and high impact in 14 (16.6 %) patients. PET/CT TNM classification was significantly more accurate (92.5 vs 73.7 %) than conventional staging with a p value < 0.001 (McNemar's test).

conclusionPET/CT should be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of stage III-IV HNSCC.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID25952280
OpenAlexW271984210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.