Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25952159›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2015

Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review.

Hedyeh Riazi, Najmeh Tehranian, Saeideh Ziaei, Easa Mohammadi, Ebrahim Hajizadeh, Ali Montazeri

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Endometriosis: An Overview.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hedyeh RiaziDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal-e Al Ahmad Highway, P.O Box 14115-331, Tehran, Iran. h.riazi@modares.ac.ir.
Najmeh TehranianDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal-e Al Ahmad Highway, P.O Box 14115-331, Tehran, Iran. Tehranian@modares.ac.ir.
Saeideh ZiaeiDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal-e Al Ahmad Highway, P.O Box 14115-331, Tehran, Iran. ziaei_sa@modares.ac.ir.
Easa MohammadiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal-e Al Ahmad Highway, P.O Box 14115-331, Tehran, Iran. mohamade@modares.ac.ir.
Ebrahim HajizadehDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal-e Al Ahmad Highway, P.O Box 14115-331, Tehran, Iran. hajizadeh@modares.ac.ir.
Ali MontazeriMental Health Research Group, Health Metrics Research Center, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, P.O Box 13185-1488, Tehran, Iran. montazeri@acecr.ac.ir.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRAcademic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate and timely diagnosis of endometriosis is associated with confusion. Clinical manifestations, imaging techniques, biomarkers and surgical techniques are used as diagnostic approaches. This paper reviews current evidence on clinical manifestation in order to help practitioners and perhaps improve women's health.

methodsA review of the literature on clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis that appeared in the English language biomedical journals was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The search strategy included the combination of key words 'endometriosis' and 'diagnosis' or 'clinical diagnosis' in the titles or abstracts of articles. The search included all papers published during the year 2000 to 2014. Then, the findings were classified in order to summarize the evidence.

resultsUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, in all 51 papers were found relevant and included in this review. In general we found three categories of diagnostic approaches for clinical manifestation including: i) diagnosis via symptoms obtained from history taking, ii) diagnosis via signs obtained from physical examination and iii) diagnosis via risk factors obtained from history taking.

conclusionDiagnosis of endometriosis is a matter of concern. Since the disease is associated with diverse clinical symptoms and signs, deeper and more comprehensive consideration according to patient's history and clinical findings is recommended for early and more accurate detection in order to prioritize women for further investigation and contribute to its early management.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisEarly Medical InterventionEndometriosisFemaleHumansMedical History TakingPelvisPhysical ExaminationSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25952159
PMCPMC4450847
OpenAlexW1599695680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.