ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2015
Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- ReaGP: integrating residual units and attention mechanisms in convolution neural network for genomic prediction.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction using a cost-effective mid-density SNP platform in spring wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction of beef quality using GWAS-prioritized markers.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Comparison of GBLUP and WGBLUP in genomic selection for beef cattle under different LD patterns and mixed multi-population scenarios: a simulation study.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Shared SNP effects across breeds increase the genomic prediction accuracy for numerically small breeds.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impact of Different Mixing Strategies on Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Beef Cattle Breeding Values in Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Genomic Predictions Cross Populations with Different Linkage Disequilibrium Patterns.Genes · 2024Article
- Genomic-inferred cross-selection methods for multi-trait improvement in a recurrent selection breeding program.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Associated with the Development of the Metritis Complex in Dairy Cattle.Genes · 2024Article
- Importance of genetic architecture in marker selection decisions for genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- A bulked segregant analysis tool for out-crossing species (BSATOS) and QTL-based genomics-assisted prediction of complex traits in apple.Journal of advanced research · 2022Article
- Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction using a reference population of multiple pure breeds and admixed individuals.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Factors affecting accuracy of estimated effective number of chromosome segments for numerically small breeds.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2021Article
- Training Set Optimization for Sparse Phenotyping in Genomic Selection: A Conceptual Overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- A multi-breed GWAS for morphometric traits in four Beninese indigenous cattle breeds reveals loci associated with conformation, carcass and adaptive traits.BMC genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough simulation studies show that combining multiple breeds in one reference population increases accuracy of genomic prediction, this is not always confirmed in empirical studies. This discrepancy might be due to the assumptions on quantitative trait loci (QTL) properties applied in simulation studies, including number of QTL, spectrum of QTL allele frequencies across breeds, and distribution of allele substitution effects. We investigated the effects of QTL properties and of including a random across- and within-breed animal effect in a genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model on accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction using genotypes of Holstein-Friesian and Jersey cows.
methodsGenotypes of three classes of variants obtained from whole-genome sequence data, with moderately low, very low or extremely low average minor allele frequencies (MAF), were imputed in 3000 Holstein-Friesian and 3000 Jersey cows that had real high-density genotypes. Phenotypes of traits controlled by QTL with different properties were simulated by sampling 100 or 1000 QTL from one class of variants and their allele substitution effects either randomly from a gamma distribution, or computed such that each QTL explained the same variance, i.e. rare alleles had a large effect. Genomic breeding values for 1000 selection candidates per breed were estimated using GBLUP modelsincluding a random across- and a within-breed animal effect.
resultsFor all three classes of QTL allele frequency spectra, accuracies of genomic prediction were not affected by the addition of 2000 individuals of the other breed to a reference population of the same breed as the selection candidates. Accuracies of both single- and multi-breed genomic prediction decreased as MAF of QTL decreased, especially when rare alleles had a large effect. Accuracies of genomic prediction were similar for the models with and without a random within-breed animal effect, probably because of insufficient power to separate across- and within-breed animal effects.
conclusionsAccuracy of both single- and multi-breed genomic prediction depends on the properties of the QTL that underlie the trait. As QTL MAF decreased, accuracy decreased, especially when rare alleles had a large effect. This demonstrates that QTL properties are key parameters that determine the accuracy of genomic prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.