ArticleSystematic reviews2015
The effectiveness of interventions to achieve co-ordinated multidisciplinary care and reduce hospital use for people with chronic diseases: study protocol for a systematic review of reviews.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of Tuberculosis (TB) and Diabetes mellitus (DM) integrated healthcare on bidirectional screening and treatment outcomes among TB patients and people living with DM in developing countries: a systematic review.Pathogens and global health · 2023Pooled it
- Does integrated care reduce hospital activity for patients with chronic diseases? An umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Predictive Factors of Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes and Stay: A Machine Learning Study with Temporal Validation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Navigating outpatient care of patients with type 2 diabetes after hospital discharge - a qualitative longitudinal study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- A new mixed agent-based network and compartmental simulation framework for joint modeling of related infectious diseases- application to sexually transmitted infections.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2023Article
- Mobile Health to Improve Adherence and Patient Experience in Heart Transplantation Recipients: The mHeart Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Interdisciplinary Mobile Health Model to Improve Clinical Care After Heart Transplantation: Implementation Strategy Study.JMIR cardio · 2020Article
- Article
- The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review.Preventive medicine reports · 2018Review
- What integrated care means from an older person's perspective? A scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Discharge interventions for older patients leaving hospital: protocol for a systematic meta-review.Systematic reviews · 2016Article
- Multimorbidity in chronic disease: impact on health care resources and costs.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2016Review
- Assessment and prevention of behavioural and social risk factors associated with oral cancer: protocol for a systematic review of clinical guidelines and systematic reviews to inform Primary Care dental professionals.Systematic reviews · 2015Article
- Intersectoral Collaboration Among Community Health and Social Workers in Disability-Related Organizations in South Korea: Awareness, Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Satisfaction.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe burden of chronic disease on patients and the health service is growing. Current health policy emphasises the need for services which provide integrated and co-ordinated care for patients with chronic diseases, but there is uncertainty about which integrated care interventions and service models may be most effective. This review of reviews aims to synthesise the available evidence about the effectiveness of such interventions and service models in terms of patient experience of health and social care, the use of hospital and other health resources, and the associated costs. METHODS/
designWe will search MEDLINE, Embase, ASSIA, PsycINFO, HMIC, CINAHL, Cochrane Library (including HTA Database, DARE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), EPPI-Centre, TRIP, and Health Economic Evaluations databases for English language systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since 2000 that have evaluated the effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with chronic diseases. Interventions must deliver care that crosses the boundary between at least two health and/or social care settings. Outcomes of interest are healthcare resource use, patient quality of life/satisfaction, costs, and care co-ordination. Data from eligible reviews will be extracted by two independent reviewers and will include study details, the design, delivery and co-ordination of interventions, and methodological quality. Evidence synthesis will focus on a narrative overview of interventions and their effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The review aims to summarise the evidence base about the effectiveness of integrated care interventions and service models and describe how interventions have been organised, co-ordinated, and delivered. The findings have the potential to impact on the commissioning of health and social care services in the UK which aim to provide integrated and co-ordinated care for patients with chronic disease and multimorbidity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015016458 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.