Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25951622›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Using "big data" to capture overall health status: properties and predictive value of a claims-based health risk score.

Rita Hamad, Sepideh Modrek, Jessica Kubo, Benjamin A Goldstein, Mark R Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cohort Profile: The American Manufacturing Cohort (AMC) study.International journal of epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Intraseason Waning of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rita HamadGeneral Medical Disciplines, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Sepideh ModrekGeneral Medical Disciplines, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Jessica KuboQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Benjamin A GoldsteinQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Mark R CullenGeneral Medical Disciplines, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Risk factors for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia: Evidence from a Large Occupational CohortR01AG026291 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LINDA, EISEN, ELLEN AURA · 2006 to 2021
$12.9M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationKL2TR001083 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Understanding and predicting cardiac events in HD using real-time EHRsK25DK097279 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSTEIN, BENJAMIN ALAN · 2013 to 2017
$797k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR 001083NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001083NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NIA NIH HHS 1 R01 AG026291NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026291NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK097279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigators across many fields often struggle with how best to capture an individual's overall health status, with options including both subjective and objective measures. With the increasing availability of "big data," researchers can now take advantage of novel metrics of health status. These predictive algorithms were initially developed to forecast and manage expenditures, yet they represent an underutilized tool that could contribute significantly to health research. In this paper, we describe the properties and possible applications of one such "health risk score," the DxCG Intelligence tool.

methodsWe link claims and administrative datasets on a cohort of U.S. workers during the period 1996-2011 (N = 14,161). We examine the risk score's association with incident diagnoses of five disease conditions, and we link employee data with the National Death Index to characterize its relationship with mortality. We review prior studies documenting the risk score's association with other health and non-health outcomes, including healthcare utilization, early retirement, and occupational injury. RESULTS AND

conclusionsWe find that the risk score is associated with outcomes across a variety of health and non-health domains. These examples demonstrate the broad applicability of this tool in multiple fields of research and illustrate its utility as a measure of overall health status for epidemiologists and other health researchers.

Indexed as

Health StatusInsurance Claim ReviewCohort StudiesHumansRisk

Identifiers

PMID25951622
PMCPMC4423900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.