Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25951495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2015

Selective depletion of tumor neovasculature by microbubble destruction with appropriate ultrasound pressure.

Junfen Wang, Zonglei Zhao, Shuxin Shen, Chuanxi Zhang, Shengcun Guo, Yongkang Lu, Yanmei Chen, Wangjun Liao, Yulin Liao, Jianping Bin

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Delivery of Cavitation Therapy With a Modified Clinical Scanner: In Vitro Evaluation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junfen WangState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zonglei ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuxin ShenState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuanxi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shengcun GuoState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yongkang LuState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanmei ChenState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wangjun LiaoDepartment of Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yulin LiaoState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianping BinState Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-intensity ultrasound-microbubble (LIUS-MB) treatment is a promising antivascular therapy for tumors. We sought to determine whether LIUS-MB treatment with an appropriate ultrasound pressure could achieve substantial and persistent cessation of tumor perfusion without having significant effects on normal tissue. Further, we investigated the mechanisms underlying this treatment. Murine S-180 sarcomas, thigh muscles, and skin tissue from 60 tumor-bearing mice were subjected to sham therapy, an ultrasound application combined with microbubbles in four different ultrasound pressures (0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 5.0 MPa), or ultrasound at 5.0 MPa alone. Subsequently, contrast-enhanced ultrasonic imaging and histological studies were performed. Tumor microvessels, tumor cell necrosis, apoptosis, tumor growth, and survival were evaluated in 85 mice after treatment with the selected ultrasound pressure. We found that twenty-four hours after LIUS-MB treatment at 3.0 MPa, blood perfusion and microvessel density of the tumor had substantially decreased by 84 ± 8% and 84%, respectively (p < 0.01). Similar reductions were not observed in the muscle or skin. Additionally, an extreme reduction in the number of immature vessels was observed in the tumor (reduced by 90%, p < 0.01), while the decrease in mature vessels was not significant. Further, LIUS-MB treatment at 3.0 MPa promoted tumor cell necrosis and apoptosis, delayed tumor growth, and increased the survival rate of tumor-bearing mice (p < 0.01). These findings indicate that LIUS-MB treatment with an appropriate ultrasound pressure could selectively and persistently reduce tumor perfusion by depleting the neovasculature. Therefore, LIUS-MB treatment offers great promise for clinical applications in antivascular therapy for solid tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorMaleMiceMicrobubblesNeovascularization, PathologicSarcoma 180SkinThighTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic Therapyantivascular therapylow-intensity ultrasoundmicrobubblestumor neovasculature

Identifiers

PMID25951495
PMCPMC5033025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.