Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25951458›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Surrogate Marker of Insulin Resistance in an Admixtured Population--Brazilian Metabolic Syndrome Study (BRAMS).

Ana Carolina J Vasques, Roberta S L Cassani, Adriana C e Forti, Brunna S Vilela, José Carlos Pareja, Marcos Antonio Tambascia, Bruno Geloneze, BRAMS Investigators

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anthropometry of Kyrgyz children: A study on the effects of age and gender.Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Carolina J VasquesLIMED-Laboratory of Investigation on Metabolism and Diabetes, Gastrocentro, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil; School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberta S L CassaniLIMED-Laboratory of Investigation on Metabolism and Diabetes, Gastrocentro, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana C e FortiDepartment of Endocrinology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Brunna S VilelaLIMED-Laboratory of Investigation on Metabolism and Diabetes, Gastrocentro, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Carlos ParejaLIMED-Laboratory of Investigation on Metabolism and Diabetes, Gastrocentro, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Antonio TambasciaDepartment of Endocrinology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno GelonezeLIMED-Laboratory of Investigation on Metabolism and Diabetes, Gastrocentro, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
BRAMS Investigators
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) has been proposed as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance (IR). However, the utilization of SAD requires specific validation for each ethnicity. We aimed to investigate the potential use of SAD, compared with classical anthropometrical parameters, as a surrogate marker of IR and to establish the cutoff values of SAD for screening for IR.

methodsA multicenter population survey on metabolic disorders was conducted. A race-admixtured sample of 824 adult women was assessed. The anthropometric parameters included: BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio and SAD. IR was determined by a hyperglycemic clamp and the HOMA-IR index.

resultsAfter adjustments for age and total body fat mass, SAD (r = 0.23 and r = -0.70) and BMI (r = 0.20 and r = -0.71) were strongly correlated with the IR measured by the HOMA-IR index and the clamp, respectively (p < 0.001). In the ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff for SAD in women was 21.0 cm. The women with an increased SAD presented 3.2 (CI 95%: 2.1-5.0) more likelihood of having IR, assessed by the HOMA-IR index compared with those with normal SAD (p < 0.001); whereas women with elevated BMI and WC were 2.1 (95% CI: 1.4-3.3) and 2.8 (95% CI: 1.7-4.5) more likely to have IR (p < 0.001), respectively. No statistically significant results were found for waist-to-hip ratio.

conclusionsSAD can be a suitable surrogate marker of IR. Understanding and applying routine and simplified methods is essential because IR is associated with an increased risk of obesity-related diseases even in the presence of normal weight, slight overweight, as well as in obesity. Further prospective analysis will need to verify SAD as a determinant of clinical outcomes, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular events, in the Brazilian population.

Indexed as

Sagittal Abdominal DiameterAdultBiomarkersBrazilFemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedROC CurveYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25951458
PMCPMC4423830
OpenAlexW291861477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.