Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25951171›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2015

Community-Engaged Strategies to Promote Relevance of Research Capacity-Building Efforts Targeting Community Organizations.

Jennifer Cunningham, Stephania T Miller, Yvonne Joosten, Jared D Elzey, Tiffany Israel, Christine King, Patrick Luther, Yolanda Vaughn, Consuelo H Wilkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Community Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Translational Research and Researchers.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer CunninghamDepartment of Surgery, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Stephania T MillerDepartment of Surgery, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yvonne JoostenVanderbilt University, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jared D ElzeyMeharry Medical College, Office for Research, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Tiffany IsraelVanderbilt University, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christine KingVanderbilt University, School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Patrick LutherNashville CARES, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yolanda VaughnNeighborhoods Resource Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Consuelo H WilkinsVanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, School of Medicine, and Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Technologies and Resources CoreU54MD007593 · NIMHD · MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI ADUNYAH, SAMUEL EVANS · 2012 to 2018
$24.7M
Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MILLER-HUGHES, STEPHANIA · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR000445NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007593NIMHD NIH HHS U54MD007593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study goal is to highlight strategies for promoting relevance of research capacity-building efforts targeting community organizations (CO)s.

methodsTwo community partners, representing two COs, were invited to participate in CO research development trainings, Community Research Forums (Forum)s. Their contributions were documented via Forum document review. Forum participants, representatives from other COs, completed post-Forum surveys to identify additional training needs and rate Forum impact relative to their training expectations. A content-based analysis and descriptive statistics were used to summarize needs assessment- and impact-related survey responses, respectively.

resultsCommunity partners were involved in eight Forum-related activities including marketing (planning), facilitation (implementation), and manuscript coauthorship (dissemination). Eighty-one individuals, representing 55 COs, attended the Forums. Needs assessment responses revealed a desire for additional assistance with existing Forum topics (e.g., defining research priorities) and a need for new ones (e.g., promoting organizational buy in for research). Ninety-one percent of participants agreed that the Forum demonstrated the value of research to COs and how to create a research agenda.

conclusionsIncluding community partners in all Forum phases ensured that CO perspectives were integrated throughout. Post-Forum needs and impact assessment results will help in tailoring, where needed, future training topics and strategies, respectively.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCommunity-Institutional RelationsCooperative BehaviorInterdisciplinary CommunicationResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansNeeds AssessmentProgram DevelopmentPublic OpinionSurveys and Questionnairescommunity capacity buildingcommunity-engaged researchCTSA

Identifiers

PMID25951171
PMCPMC4626308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.