ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
A dynamical phyllotaxis model to determine floral organ number.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Metabolome and Transcriptome Profiling Provide Molecular Insights into Floral Bud Differentiation inBiology · 2025Article
- Size-correlated polymorphisms in phyllotaxis-like periodic and symmetric tentacle arrangements in hydrozoanFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Flower Development in the Solanaceae.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Model-based plant phenomics on morphological traits using morphometric descriptors.Breeding science · 2022Article
- Rotation angle of stem cell division plane controls spiral phyllotaxis in mosses.Journal of plant research · 2021Article
- Developmental stochasticity and variation in floral phyllotaxis.Journal of plant research · 2021Review
- Mathematical model studies of the comprehensive generation of major and minor phyllotactic patterns in plants with a predominant focus on orixate phyllotaxis.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Understanding the role of floral development in the evolution of angiosperm flowers: clarifications from a historical and physico-dynamic perspective.Journal of plant research · 2018Review
- Spiral phyllotaxis underlies constrained variation in Anemone (Ranunculaceae) tepal arrangement.Journal of plant research · 2018Article
- Two-stage patterning dynamics in conifer cotyledon whorl morphogenesis.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- Morphological Plant Modeling: Unleashing Geometric and Topological Potential within the Plant Sciences.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Review
- Relationship between the species-representative phenotype and intraspecific variation in Ranunculaceae floral organ and Asteraceae flower numbers.Annals of botany · 2016Article
- Characterizing Floral Symmetry in the Core Goodeniaceae with Geometric Morphometrics.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How organisms determine particular organ numbers is a fundamental key to the development of precise body structures; however, the developmental mechanisms underlying organ-number determination are unclear. In many eudicot plants, the primordia of sepals and petals (the floral organs) first arise sequentially at the edge of a circular, undifferentiated region called the floral meristem, and later transition into a concentric arrangement called a whorl, which includes four or five organs. The properties controlling the transition to whorls comprising particular numbers of organs is little explored. We propose a development-based model of floral organ-number determination, improving upon earlier models of plant phyllotaxis that assumed two developmental processes: the sequential initiation of primordia in the least crowded space around the meristem and the constant growth of the tip of the stem. By introducing mutual repulsion among primordia into the growth process, we numerically and analytically show that the whorled arrangement emerges spontaneously from the sequential initiation of primordia. Moreover, by allowing the strength of the inhibition exerted by each primordium to decrease as the primordium ages, we show that pentamerous whorls, in which the angular and radial positions of the primordia are consistent with those observed in sepal and petal primordia in Silene coeli-rosa, Caryophyllaceae, become the dominant arrangement. The organ number within the outmost whorl, corresponding to the sepals, takes a value of four or five in a much wider parameter space than that in which it takes a value of six or seven. These results suggest that mutual repulsion among primordia during growth and a temporal decrease in the strength of the inhibition during initiation are required for the development of the tetramerous and pentamerous whorls common in eudicots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.