Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25950566›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Amyloidogenic propensity of a natural variant of human apolipoprotein A-I: stability and interaction with ligands.

Silvana A Rosú, Omar J Rimoldi, Eduardo D Prieto, Lucrecia M Curto, José M Delfino, Nahuel A Ramella, M Alejandra Tricerri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Effects of superoxide anion attack on the lipoprotein HDL.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2023
    Article
  3. On the Aggregation of Apolipoprotein A-I.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Effects of Ionic Liquids on Metalloproteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana A RosúInstituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata (INIBIOLP), CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Omar J RimoldiInstituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata (INIBIOLP), CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo D PrietoInstituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata (INIBIOLP), CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas (INIFTA), Universidad Nacional de La Plata-CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lucrecia M CurtoDepartamento de Química Biológica e Instituto de Bioquímica y Biofísica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
José M DelfinoDepartamento de Química Biológica e Instituto de Bioquímica y Biofísica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nahuel A RamellaInstituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata (INIBIOLP), CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M Alejandra TricerriInstituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata (INIBIOLP), CONICET, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Biochemistry Research Institute of La Plata · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstituto de Química y Fisicoquímica Biológicas · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of naturally occurring mutations of human apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) have been associated with hereditary amyloidoses. The molecular mechanisms involved in amyloid-associated pathology remain largely unknown. Here we examined the effects of the Arg173Pro point mutation in apoA-I on the structure, stability, and aggregation propensity, as well as on the ability to bind to putative ligands. Our results indicate that the mutation induces a drastic loss of stability, and a lower efficiency to bind to phospholipid vesicles at physiological pH, which could determine the observed higher tendency to aggregate as pro-amyloidogenic complexes. Incubation under acidic conditions does not seem to induce significant desestabilization or aggregation tendency, neither does it contribute to the binding of the mutant to sodium dodecyl sulfate. While the binding to this detergent is higher for the mutant as compared to wt apoA-I, the interaction of the Arg173Pro variant with heparin depends on pH, being lower at pH 5.0 and higher than wt under physiological pH conditions. We suggest that binding to ligands as heparin or other glycosaminoglycans could be key events tuning the fine details of the interaction of apoA-I variants with the micro-environment, and probably eliciting the toxicity of these variants in hereditary amyloidoses.

Indexed as

Point MutationAmyloidogenic ProteinsApolipoprotein A-IArginineHeparinHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularPhospholipidsProlineProtein AggregatesProtein BindingProtein StabilitySodium Dodecyl SulfateAmyloidogenic ProteinsApolipoprotein A-IArginineHeparinPhospholipidsProlineProtein AggregatesSodium Dodecyl Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID25950566
PMCPMC4423886
OpenAlexW370538813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.