ArticleLondon journal of primary care2013
Sharing electronic records: separating out the signals from ethical white noise.
Article in London journal of primary care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Education and debate: a manifesto for ethics and values at annual healthcare conferences.London journal of primary care · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of shared electronic records has been galvanised by initiatives to improve the information technology infrastructure of healthcare and by fragmentation of healthcare provision. This report uses a public discussion by the RCGP Ethics Committee, Patient Participation Group and the Informatics Group to review key issues relating to shared electronic healthcare records. These records may be a social necessity, and ethical and legal safeguards may allay some public and professional anxiety about their appropriate use. Many of the specific ethical concerns, such as confidentiality of healthcare information, are not new but how these concerns arise in context may be. Function creep was a key concern in the discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25949702PMC3960642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.