Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25949644›Full record

ArticleLondon journal of primary care2011

The role of research in helping general practice commission efficient healthcare.

Richard Baker, Mei Yee Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in London journal of primary care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard Baker
Mei Yee TangNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland (LNR).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new commissioning consortia face a major challenge in improving the efficiency of the NHS. They are new organisations, and at the same time as establishing themselves they need to overcome significant obstacles to reforming services. Research evidence about the value of care can help consortia achieve efficiencies, but there are often delays between the provision of evidence and its routine use in policy and practice. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) has invested substantial funding in providing evidence for the NHS, and in this article we discuss how consortia can make sure they obtain and apply relevant evidence as quickly as possible, and also generate evidence on practical questions such as the impact of redesigned services. Partnership with NIHR research organizations, particularly the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Research and Care (CLAHRCs), offer one approach to helping consortia commission efficient health care.

Indexed as

healthcare organisationsprimary health careresearch

Identifiers

PMID25949644
PMCPMC3960678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.