Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25949616›Full record

ArticleLondon journal of primary care2010

Antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in children: how can we improve?

Graham Easton, Sonia Saxena

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in London journal of primary care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Graham EastonGeneral Practitioner, Ealing PCT, London, UK and Senior Clinical Teaching Fellow, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.
Sonia SaxenaGP and Consultant Senior Lecturer in Primary Care, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PDA/02/06/076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) in children is one of the most common problems that general practitioners (GPs) see. Although complications from URTIs are rare, and antibiotics offer little or no benefit in uncomplicated cases, antibiotic prescribing has increased in recent years following a decline in the late 1990s. This article explores possible reasons for the increase, weighs the evidence on withholding antibiotics and asks how GPs will interpret recent National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellent (NICE) guidelines when dealing with URTI in children. We review some of the latest approaches to help implement antibiotic prescribing guidelines and suggest some practical solutions to help busy GPs.

Indexed as

antibioticschildrenguidelinesprescribingupper respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

PMID25949616
PMCPMC3960681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.