Comprehensive Primary Health Care: a new phase?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Drug-herb interactions: a challenge and clinical concern in primary healthcare.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
   Review
2. Evaluation of care for people with HIV in Primary Health Care: construct validation.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025
   Article
3. Primary Care Networks and Starfield's 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
   Article
4. General practitioners' perceptions on their role in light of the NHS five year forward view: a qualitative study.London journal of primary care · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.